ODEFSEY

6 ADVERSE REACTIONS The following adverse reactions are discussed in other sections of the labeling: Severe Acute Exacerbations of Hepatitis B [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) ] Skin and Hypersensitivity Reactions [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2) ] Hepatotoxicity [see Warnings and Precautions (5.3) ] Depressive Disorders [see Warnings and Precautions (5.4) ] New Onset or Worsening Renal Impairment [see Warnings and Precautions (5.5) ] Lactic Acidosis/Severe Hepatomegaly with Steatosis [see Warnings and Precautions (5.7) ] Immune Reconstitution Syndrome [see Warnings and Precautions (5.8) ] Most common adverse reactions (incidence greater than or equal to 2%, all grades) are headache and sleep disturbances. ( 6.1 ) To report SUSPECTED ADVERSE REACTIONS, contact Gilead Sciences, Inc. at 1-800-GILEAD-5 or FDA at 1-800-FDA-1088 or www.fda.gov/medwatch. 6.1 Clinical Trials Experience Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug (or a drug given in various combinations with other concomitant therapy) cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug (or drug given in the same or different combination therapy) and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. Adverse Reactions in Clinical Trials of ODEFSEY in Virologically-Suppressed Adult Subjects with HIV-1 Infection The safety of ODEFSEY in virologically-suppressed adults is based on Week 48 data from two randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled clinical trials, 1160 and 1216, that enrolled 1505 adult subjects who were virologically-suppressed for at least 6 months. Both trials were designed to compare switching to ODEFSEY to maintaining efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (EFV/FTC/TDF) or emtricitabine/rilpivirine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/RPV/TDF) in Trials 1160 and 1216, respectively. A total of 754 subjects received one tablet of ODEFSEY daily [see Clinical Studies (14.1) ]. The most common adverse reactions (all Grades) reported in at least 2% of subjects in the ODEFSEY group across Trials 1216 and 1160 were headache and sleep disturbances (Table 1). Over 98% of the adverse reactions in the ODEFSEY group were of mild to moderate intensity. The proportion of subjects who discontinued treatment with ODEFSEY due to adverse events, regardless of severity, was 2% compared to 1% for FTC/RPV/TDF and 2% for EFV/FTC/TDF. Table 1 Adverse Reactions Frequencies of adverse reactions are based on all adverse events attributed to study drugs by the investigator. (All Grades) Reported in ≥1% of HIV-1 Infected Virologically-Suppressed Adults in Trial 1160 or Trial 1216 (Week 48 analysis) Adverse Reaction Trial 1160 Trial 1216 ODEFSEY (N=438) EFV/FTC/TDF (N=437) Data from Trials 1160 and 1216 do not provide an adequate basis for comparison of adverse reaction incidences between ODEFSEY and the FTC/RPV/TDF and EFV/FTC/TDF groups. ODEFSEY (N=316) FTC/RPV/TDF (N=313) Headache 2% 1% 0 1% Sleep Disturbances 2% 1% 0 <1% Flatulence 1% <1% <1% 1% Abnormal Dreams 1% 1% 0 2% Diarrhea 1% 3% 1% 2% Nausea 1% 1% 1% 1% Renal Laboratory Tests In Trial 1216, the median baseline eGFR was104 mL per minute for subjects who switched to ODEFSEY from FTC/RPV/TDF (N=316) and the mean serum creatinine decreased by 0.02 mg per dL from baseline to Week 48. In Trial 1160, the median baseline eGFR was 110 mL per minute for subjects who switched to ODEFSEY from EFV/FTC/TDF (N=438), and the mean serum creatinine increased by 0.1 mg per dL from baseline to Week 48. Bone Mineral Density Effects Changes in BMD from baseline to Week 48 were assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in Trials 1216 and 1160. In Trial 1216, mean bone mineral density (BMD) increased in subjects who switched to ODEFSEY (1.61% lumbar spine, 1.04% total hip) and remained stable or decreased in subjects who remained on FTC/RPV/TDF (0.08% lumbar spine, −0.25% total hip). BMD declines of 5% or greater at the lumbar spine were experienced by 1.7% of ODEFSEY subjects and 3.0% of FTC/RPV/TDF subjects. BMD declines of 7% or greater at the femoral neck were experienced by 0% of ODEFSEY subjects and 1.2% of FTC/RPV/TDF subjects. In Trial 1160, mean BMD increased in subjects who switched to ODEFSEY (1.65% lumbar spine, 1.28% total hip) and decreased slightly in subjects who remained on EFV/FTC/TDF (−0.05% lumbar spine, −0.13% total hip). BMD declines of 5% or greater at the lumbar spine were experienced by 2.3% of ODEFSEY subjects and 4.9% of EFV/FTC/TDF subjects. BMD declines of 7% or greater at the femoral neck were experienced by 1.4% of ODEFSEY subjects and 3.3% of EFV/FTC/TDF subjects. The long-term clinical significance of these BMD changes is not known. Serum Lipids Changes from baseline in total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, and total cholesterol to HDL ratio for Trials 1216 and 1160 are presented in Table 2. Table 2 Lipid Values, Mean Change from Baseline Reported in Subjects Receiving ODEFSEY, FTC/RPV/TDF and EFV/FTC/TDF in Trials 1216 and 1160 at 48 Weeks Trial 1216 Trial 1160 ODEFSEY N=316 [n=235] FTC/RPV/TDF N=314 [n=245] ODEFSEY N=438 [n=295] EFV/FTC/TDF N=437 [n=308] Baseline Week 48 Baseline Week 48 Baseline Week 48 Baseline Week 48 mg/dL Change The change from baseline is the mean of within-subject changes from baseline for subjects with both baseline and Week 48 values. , Subjects who received lipid-lowering agents during the treatment period were excluded. mg/dL Change , mg/dL Change , mg/dL Change , Total Cholesterol (fasted) 176 +17 171 0 193 -7 192 -3 HDL-Cholesterol (fasted) 50 +3 48 0 56 -4 55 -2 LDL-Cholesterol (fasted) 111 +13 108 +1 118 [n=296] for ODEFSEY group in Study 1160 for LDL-Cholesterol (fasted) -1 119 -1 Triglycerides (fasted) 116 +12 119 -9 139 -12 133 +3 Total Cholesterol to HDL Ratio 3.7 +0.2 3.8 +0.1 3.7 +0.2 3.8 0 Adverse Reactions in Clinical Trials of RPV-Containing Regimens in Treatment-Naïve Adult Subjects with HIV-1 Infection In pooled 96-week trials of antiretroviral treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected adult subjects, the most common adverse reactions in subjects treated with RPV+FTC/TDF (N=550) (incidence greater than or equal to 2%, Grades 2–4) were headache, depressive disorders, and insomnia. The proportion of subjects who discontinued treatment with RPV+FTC/TDF due to adverse reactions, regardless of severity, was 2%. The most common adverse reactions that led to discontinuation in this treatment group were psychiatric disorders (1.6%) and rash (0.2%). Although the safety profile was similar in virologically-suppressed adults with HIV-1 infection who were switched to RPV and other antiretroviral drugs, the frequency of adverse events increased by 20% (N=317). Adverse Reactions in Clinical Trials of FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI in Treatment-Naïve Adult Subjects with HIV-1 Infection In pooled 48-week trials of antiretroviral treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected adult subjects, the most common adverse reaction in subjects treated with FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI (N=866) (incidence greater than or equal to 10%, all grades) was nausea (10%). In this treatment group, 0.9% of subjects discontinued FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI due to adverse event [see Clinical Studies (14) ] . Antiretroviral treatment-naïve adult subjects treated with FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI experienced mean increases of 30 mg/dL of total cholesterol, 15 mg/dL of LDL cholesterol, 7 mg/dL of HDL cholesterol and 29 mg/dL of triglycerides after 48 weeks of use. Renal Laboratory Tests In two 48-week trials in antiretroviral treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected adults treated with FTC+TAF with elvitegravir (EVG) plus cobicistat (COBI) (N=866) with a median baseline eGFR of 115 mL per minute, mean serum creatinine increased by 0.1 mg per dL from baseline to Week 48. In clinical trials of FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI in treatment-naïve subjects and in virologically-suppressed subjects switched to FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI with estimated creatinine clearance greater than 50 mL per minute, renal serious adverse events or discontinuations due to renal adverse reactions were encountered in less than 1% of participants treated with FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI. In a 24-week trial in adults with renal impairment (baseline eGFR 30 to 69 mL per minute) who received FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI (N=248), mean serum creatinine was 1.5 mg per dL at both baseline and Week 24. FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI was permanently discontinued due to worsening renal function in two of 80 (3%) subjects. Bone Mineral Density Effects In the pooled analysis of two 48-week trials of antiretroviral treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected adult subjects, bone mineral density (BMD) from baseline to Week 48 was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Mean BMD decreased from baseline to Week 48 by -1.30% with FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI at the lumbar spine and -0.66% at the total hip. BMD declines of 5% or greater at the lumbar spine were experienced by 10% of FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI subjects. BMD declines of 7% or greater at the femoral neck were experienced by 7% of FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI subjects. The long-term clinical significance of these BMD changes is not known. Adverse Reactions in Clinical Trials in Pediatric Subjects with HIV-1 Infection In an open-label 48-week trial of 36 antiretroviral treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected pediatric subjects 12 to less than 18 years old (weighing at least 32 kg) treated with 25 mg per day of RPV and other antiretrovirals, the most common adverse reactions were headache (19%), depression (19%), somnolence (14%), nausea (11%), dizziness (8%), abdominal pain (8%), vomiting (6%) and rash (6%). In a 24-week, open-label trial of 23 antiretroviral treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected pediatric subjects aged 12 to less than 18 years old (weighing at least 35 kg) who received FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI, the safety of this combination was similar to that of adults. Among these pediatric subjects, mean BMD increased from baseline to Week 24, +1.7% at the lumbar spine and +0.8% for the total body less head. Mean changes from baseline BMD Z-scores were -0.10 for lumbar spine and -0.11 for total body less head at Week 24. Two subjects had significant (greater than 4%) lumbar spine BMD loss at Week 24. 6.2 Postmarketing Experience The following adverse reactions have been identified during postmarketing experience in patients receiving RPV or TAF-containing regimens. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. Rilpivirine: Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders Weight increased Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders Severe skin and hypersensitivity reactions including DRESS (Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms) Renal and Urinary Disorders Nephrotic syndrome Tenofovir alafenamide: Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders Angioedema, urticaria, and rash Renal and Urinary Disorders Acute renal failure, acute tubular necrosis, proximal renal tubulopathy, and Fanconi syndrome

4 CONTRAINDICATIONS ODEFSEY is contraindicated when coadministered with the following drugs; coadministration may result in loss of virologic response and possible resistance to ODEFSEY or to the class of NNRTIs [see Warnings and Precautions (5.6) , Drug Interactions (7) and Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ]: Anticonvulsants: carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin Antimycobacterials: rifampin, rifapentine Glucocorticoid (systemic): dexamethasone (more than a single-dose) Herbal Products: St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) Proton Pump Inhibitors: e.g., dexlansoprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole, omeprazole, pantoprazole, rabeprazole ODEFSEY is contraindicated when coadministered with drugs where significant decreases in RPV plasma concentrations may occur, which may result in loss of virologic response and possible resistance and cross-resistance. ( 4 )

11 DESCRIPTION ODEFSEY (emtricitabine, rilpivirine, and tenofovir alafenamide) is a fixed-dose combination tablet containing emtricitabine (FTC), rilpivirine (RPV), and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) for oral administration. FTC, a synthetic nucleoside analog of cytidine, is an HIV-1 nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitor (HIV-1 NRTI). RPV is an HIV-1 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). TAF, an HIV-1 NRTI, is converted in vivo to tenofovir, an acyclic nucleoside phosphonate (nucleotide) analog of adenosine 5′-monophosphate. Each tablet contains 200 mg of FTC, 25 mg of RPV (equivalent to 27.5 of rilpivirine hydrochloride) and 25 mg of TAF (equivalent to 28 mg of tenofovir alafenamide fumarate) and the following inactive ingredients: croscarmellose sodium, lactose monohydrate, magnesium stearate, microcrystalline cellulose, polysorbate 20, and povidone. The tablets are film-coated with a coating material containing iron oxide black, polyethylene glycol, polyvinyl alcohol, talc, and titanium dioxide. Emtricitabine: The chemical name of FTC is 4-amino-5-fluoro-1-(2 R -hydroxymethyl-1,3-oxathiolan-5 S -yl)-(1 H )-pyrimidin-2-one. FTC is the (-)enantiomer of a thio analog of cytidine, which differs from other cytidine analogs in that it has a fluorine in the 5 position. FTC has a molecular formula of C 8 H 10 FN 3 O 3 S and a molecular weight of 247.24 and has the following structural formula: FTC is a white to off-white powder with a solubility of approximately 112 mg per mL in water at 25 °C. Rilpivirine: The chemical name of rilpivirine hydrochloride drug substance is 4-[[4-[[4-[(E)-2-cyanoethenyl]-2,6-dimethylphenyl]amino]-2-pyrimidinyl]amino]benzonitrile monohydrochloride. Its molecular formula is C 22 H 18 N 6 ∙ HCl and its molecular weight is 402.88. Rilpivirine hydrochloride has the following structural formula: Rilpivirine hydrochloride is a white to almost white powder. Rilpivirine hydrochloride is practically insoluble in water over a wide pH range. Tenofovir Alafenamide: The chemical name of tenofovir alafenamide fumarate drug substance is L-alanine, N -[( S )-[[(1 R )-2-(6-amino-9 H -purin-9-yl)-1-methylethoxy]methyl]phenoxyphosphinyl]-, 1-methylethyl ester, (2 E )-2-butenedioate (2:1). Tenofovir alafenamide fumarate has an empirical formula of C 21 H 29 O 5 N 6 P∙½(C 4 H 4 O 4 ) and a formula weight of 534.50 and has the following structural formula: Tenofovir alafenamide fumarate is a white to off-white or tan powder with a solubility of 4.7 mg per mL in water at 20 °C. Chemical Structure Chemical Structure Chemical Structure

2 DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION Testing: Prior to or when initiating ODEFSEY, test for hepatitis B virus infection. Prior to or when initiating ODEFSEY, and during treatment on a clinically appropriate schedule, assess serum creatinine, estimated creatinine clearance, urine glucose, and urine protein in all patients. In patients with chronic kidney disease, also assess serum phosphorus ( 2.1 ) Recommended dosage: one tablet taken orally once daily with a meal. ( 2.2 ) For pregnant patients who are already on ODEFSEY prior to pregnancy and who are virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL), one tablet taken once daily may be continued. Lower exposures of rilpivirine were observed during pregnancy, therefore viral load should be monitored closely. ( 2.3 ) Renal impairment: ODEFSEY is not recommended in patients with estimated creatinine clearance of 15 to below 30 mL per minute, or below 15 mL per minute who are not receiving chronic hemodialysis. ( 2.4 ) 2.1 Testing Prior to Initiation and During Treatment with ODEFSEY Prior to or when initiating ODEFSEY, test patients for hepatitis B virus infection [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) ] . Prior to or when initiating ODEFSEY, and during treatment with ODEFSEY, on a clinically appropriate schedule, assess serum creatinine, estimated creatinine clearance, urine glucose, and urine protein in all patients. In patients with chronic kidney disease, also assess serum phosphorus [see Warnings and Precautions (5.5) ]. 2.2 Recommended Dosage ODEFSEY is a three-drug fixed dose combination product containing 200 mg of emtricitabine (FTC), 25 mg of rilpivirine (RPV), and 25 mg of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF). The recommended dosage of ODEFSEY is one tablet taken orally once daily with a meal in adults and pediatric patients with body weight at least 35 kg and creatinine clearance greater than or equal to 30 mL per minute [see Use in Specific Populations (8.6) and Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ]. 2.3 Recommended Dosage During Pregnancy For pregnant patients who are already on ODEFSEY prior to pregnancy and are virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL), one tablet of ODEFSEY taken once daily may be continued. Lower exposures of rilpivirine, a component of ODEFSEY, were observed during pregnancy, therefore viral load should be monitored closely [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1) and Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ] . 2.4 Not Recommended in Patients with Severe Renal Impairment ODEFSEY is not recommended in patients with: severe renal impairment (estimated creatinine clearance of 15 to below 30 mL per minute); or end stage renal disease (ESRD; estimated creatinine clearance below 15 mL per minute) who are not receiving chronic hemodialysis [see Dosage and Administration (2.2) , Warnings and Precautions (5.5) , and Use in Specific Populations (8.6) ].

1 INDICATIONS AND USAGE ODEFSEY is indicated as a complete regimen for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in adult and pediatric patients weighing at least 35 kg: as initial therapy in those with no antiretroviral treatment history with HIV-1 RNA less than or equal to 100,000 copies per mL or to replace a stable antiretroviral regimen in those who are virologically-suppressed (HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL) for at least 6 months with no history of treatment failure and no known substitutions associated with resistance to the individual components of ODEFSEY [see Microbiology (12.4) and Clinical Studies (14) ]. ODEFSEY is a three-drug combination of emtricitabine (FTC) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), both HIV nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), and rilpivirine (RPV), a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), and is indicated as a complete regimen for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in patients weighing at least 35kg as initial therapy in those with no antiretroviral treatment history with HIV-1 RNA less than or equal to 100,000 copies per mL; or to replace a stable antiretroviral regimen in those who are virologically-suppressed (HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL) for at least 6 months with no history of treatment failure and no known substitutions associated with resistance to the individual components of ODEFSEY. ( 1 ) Limitations of Use : More rilpivirine-treated subjects with HIV-1 RNA greater than 100,000 copies/mL at the start of therapy experienced virologic failure (HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL) compared to rilpivirine-treated subjects with HIV-1 RNA less than or equal to 100,000 copies/mL. ( 14.2 , 14.3 ) Limitations of Use: More rilpivirine-treated subjects with no antiretroviral treatment history with HIV-1 RNA greater than 100,000 copies/mL at the start of therapy experienced virologic failure (HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL) compared to rilpivirine-treated subjects with HIV-1 RNA less than or equal to 100,000 copies/mL [see Clinical Studies (14.2 , 14.3) ].

10 OVERDOSAGE Limited data are available on overdose of the components of ODEFSEY in patients. If overdose occurs, monitor the patient for evidence of toxicity. Treatment of overdose with ODEFSEY consists of general supportive measures including monitoring of vital signs and ECG (QT interval) as well as observation of the clinical status of the patient. Emtricitabine (FTC): Hemodialysis treatment removes approximately 30% of the FTC dose over a 3-hour dialysis period starting within 1.5 hours of FTC dosing (blood flow rate of 400 mL per minute and a dialysate flow rate of 600 mL per minute). It is not known whether FTC can be removed by peritoneal dialysis. Rilpivirine (RPV): Human experience of overdose with RPV is limited. There is no specific antidote for overdose with RPV. Since RPV is highly bound to plasma protein, dialysis is unlikely to result in significant removal of RPV. Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF): Tenofovir is efficiently removed by hemodialysis with an extraction coefficient of approximately 54%.

7 DRUG INTERACTIONS ODEFSEY is a complete regimen for the treatment of HIV-1 infection; therefore, coadministration with other antiretroviral medications for the treatment of HIV-1 infection is not recommended. ( 7.1 ) Consult the Full Prescribing Information prior to and during treatment for important drug interactions. ( 4 , 5.6 , 7 ) 7.1 Not Recommended with Other Antiretroviral Medications Because ODEFSEY is a complete regimen, coadministration with other antiretroviral medications for the treatment of HIV-1 infection is not recommended. 7.2 Drugs Inducing or Inhibiting CYP3A Enzymes RPV is primarily metabolized by CYP3A, and drugs that induce or inhibit CYP3A may affect the clearance of RPV [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ] . Coadministration of RPV and drugs that induce CYP3A may result in decreased plasma concentrations of RPV and loss of virologic response and possible resistance to RPV or to the class of NNRTIs [see Contraindications (4) , Warnings and Precautions (5.6) , and Table 3 ] . Coadministration of RPV and drugs that inhibit CYP3A may result in increased plasma concentrations of RPV and possible adverse events. 7.3 Drugs Inducing or Inhibiting P-glycoprotein TAF, a component of ODEFSEY, is a substrate of P-gp, BCRP, OATP1B1, and OATP1B3. Drugs that strongly affect P-gp and BCRP activity may lead to changes in TAF absorption (see Table 3 ) . Drugs that induce P-gp activity are expected to decrease the absorption of TAF, resulting in decreased plasma concentration of TAF, which may lead to loss of therapeutic effect of ODEFSEY and development of resistance. Coadministration of ODEFSEY with other drugs that inhibit P-gp and BCRP may increase the absorption and plasma concentration of TAF. 7.4 Drugs Increasing Gastric pH Coadministration of RPV with drugs that increase gastric pH may decrease plasma concentrations of RPV and lead to loss of virologic response and possible resistance to RPV or to the class of NNRTIs. Use of RPV with proton pump inhibitors is contraindicated and use of RPV with H 2 -receptor antagonists requires staggered administration [see Contraindications (4) and Table 3 ]. 7.5 QT Prolonging Drugs There is limited information available on the potential for a pharmacodynamic interaction between RPV and drugs that prolong the QTc interval. In a study of healthy subjects, higher than recommended doses of RPV, 75 mg once daily and 300 mg once daily (3 times and 12 times recommended daily dose in ODEFSEY) prolonged the QTc interval [see Warnings and Precautions (5.6) and Clinical Pharmacology (12.2) ] . Consider alternative medications to ODEFSEY in patients taking a drug with a known risk of Torsade de Pointes. 7.6 Drugs Affecting Renal Function Because FTC and tenofovir are primarily excreted by the kidneys by a combination of glomerular filtration and active tubular secretion, coadministration of ODEFSEY with drugs that reduce renal function or compete for active tubular secretion may increase concentrations of FTC, tenofovir, and other renally eliminated drugs and this may increase the risk of adverse reactions. Some examples of drugs that are eliminated by active tubular secretion include, but are not limited to, acyclovir, cidofovir, ganciclovir, valacyclovir, valganciclovir, aminoglycosides (e.g., gentamicin), and high-dose or multiple NSAIDs [see Warnings and Precautions (5.5) ] . 7.7 Significant Drug Interactions Table 3 provides a listing of established or potentially clinically significant drug interactions with recommended steps to prevent or manage the drug interaction (the table is not all inclusive). The drug interactions described are based on studies conducted with either ODEFSEY, the components of ODEFSEY (FTC, RPV and TAF) as individual agents, or are predicted drug interactions that may occur with ODEFSEY [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) , Tables 8–11]. For list of contraindicated drugs, [see Contraindications (4) ]. Table 3 Significant This table is not all inclusive. Drug Interactions Concomitant Drug Class: Drug Name Effect on Concentration Increase=↑; Decrease=↓; No Effect=↔ Clinical Comment Antacids: antacids (e.g., aluminum, magnesium hydroxide, or calcium carbonate) ↔ RPV (antacids taken at least 2 hours before or at least 4 hours after RPV) ↓ RPV (concomitant intake) Administer antacids at least 2 hours before or at least 4 hours after ODEFSEY. Anticonvulsants: carbamazepine oxcarbazepine phenobarbital phenytoin ↓ RPV Coadministration is contraindicated due to potential for loss of virologic response and development of resistance. Antimycobacterials: rifampin rifapentine ↓ RPV Coadministration is contraindicated due to potential for loss of virologic response and development of resistance. Antimycobacterials: rifabutin ↓ RPV The interaction was evaluated in a clinical study. All other drug interactions shown are predicted. ↓ TAF Coadministration of ODEFSEY with rifabutin is not recommended. Azole Antifungal Agents: fluconazole itraconazole ketoconazole posaconazole voriconazole ↑ RPV , This interaction study has been performed with a dose higher than the recommended dose for RPV. The dosing recommendation is applicable to the recommended dose of RPV 25 mg once daily. ↑­ TAF ↓ ketoconazole , No dosage adjustment is required when ODEFSEY is coadministered with azole antifungal agents. Clinically monitor for breakthrough fungal infections when azole antifungals are coadministered with ODEFSEY. Glucocorticoid (systemic): dexamethasone (more than a single dose) ↓ RPV Coadministration is contraindicated due to potential for loss of virologic response and development of resistance. H 2 -Receptor Antagonists: cimetidine famotidine nizatidine ranitidine ↔ RPV , (famotidine taken 12 hours before RPV or 4 hours after RPV) ↓ RPV , (famotidine taken 2 hours before RPV) Administer H 2 -receptor antagonists at least 12 hours before or at least 4 hours after ODEFSEY. Herbal Products: St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) ↓ RPV Coadministration is contraindicated due to potential for loss of virologic response and development of resistance. Macrolide or Ketolide Antibiotics: clarithromycin erythromycin telithromycin ↑­ RPV ↔ clarithromycin ↔ erythromycin ↔ telithromycin Where possible, alternatives such as azithromycin should be considered. Narcotic Analgesics: methadone ↓ R(–) methadone ↓ S(+) methadone ↔ RPV ↔ methadone (when used with tenofovir) No dosage adjustments are required when initiating coadministration of methadone with ODEFSEY. However, clinical monitoring is recommended, as methadone maintenance therapy may need to be adjusted in some patients. Proton Pump Inhibitors: e.g., dexlansoprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole, omeprazole, pantoprazole, rabeprazole ↓ RPV Coadministration is contraindicated due to potential for loss of virologic response and development of resistance. 7.8 Drugs Without Clinically Significant Interactions with ODEFSEY Based on drug interaction studies conducted with the fixed dose combination or components of ODEFSEY, no clinically significant drug interactions have been observed when ODEFSEY is combined with the following drugs: acetaminophen, atorvastatin, chlorzoxazone, digoxin, ethinyl estradiol, ledipasvir, metformin, midazolam, norethindrone, norgestimate, sildenafil, simeprevir, sofosbuvir, velpatasvir, and voxilaprevir.

12 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY 12.1 Mechanism of Action ODEFSEY is a fixed dose combination of antiretroviral drugs emtricitabine, rilpivirine, and tenofovir alafenamide [see Microbiology (12.4) ] . 12.2 Pharmacodynamics Cardiac Electrophysiology When higher than recommended RPV doses of 75 mg (3 times the recommended dosage in ODEFSEY) once daily and 300 mg (12 times the recommended dosage in ODEFSEY) once daily were studied in healthy adults, the maximum mean time-matched (95% upper confidence bound) differences in QTcF interval from placebo after baseline correction were 10.7 (15.3) and 23.3 (28.4) milliseconds, respectively. Steady-state administration of RPV 75 mg once daily and 300 mg once daily resulted in a mean steady-state C max approximately 2.6 times and 6.7 times, respectively, higher than the mean C max observed with the recommended 25 mg once daily dose of RPV [see Warnings and Precautions (5.6) ] . The effect of RPV at the recommended dose of 25 mg once daily on the QTcF interval was evaluated in a randomized, placebo-, and active- (moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily) controlled crossover study in 60 healthy adults, with 13 measurements over 24 hours at steady state. The maximum mean time-matched (95% upper confidence bound) differences in QTcF interval from placebo after baseline correction was 2 (5) milliseconds (i.e., below the threshold of clinical concern). In a thorough QT/QTc study in 48 healthy subjects, TAF at the recommended dose and at a dose approximately 5 times the recommended dose, did not affect the QT/QTc interval and did not prolong the PR interval. The effect of FTC on the QT interval is not known. 12.3 Pharmacokinetics Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion The pharmacokinetic properties of the components of ODEFSEY are provided in Table 4. The multiple dose pharmacokinetic parameters of FTC, RPV and TAF and its metabolite tenofovir are provided in Table 5. Table 4 Pharmacokinetic Properties of the Components of ODEFSEY Rilpivirine Emtricitabine Tenofovir Alafenamide PBMCs = peripheral blood mononuclear cells; CES1 = carboxylesterase 1. Absorption T max (h) 4 3 1 Effect of moderate fat meal (relative to fasting) Values refer to geometric mean ratio [fed/ fasted] in PK parameters and (90% confidence interval). High-calorie/high-fat meal = ~800 kcal, 50% fat. Moderate-fat meal = ~600 kcal, 27% fat. AUC Ratio = 1.13 (1.03, 1.23) AUC Ratio = 0.91 (0.89, 0.93) AUC Ratio = 1.45 (1.33, 1.58) Effect of high fat meal (relative to fasting) AUC Ratio = 1.72 (1.49, 1.99) AUC Ratio = 0.88 (0.85, 0.90) AUC Ratio = 1.53 (1.39, 1.69) Distribution % Bound to human plasma proteins ~99 <4 ~80 Source of protein binding data In vitro In vitro Ex vivo Blood-to-plasma ratio 0.7 0.6 1.0 Metabolism Metabolism CYP3A Not significantly metabolized Cathepsin A In vivo, TAF is hydrolyzed within cells to form tenofovir (major metabolite), which is phosphorylated to the active metabolite, tenofovir diphosphate. In vitro studies have shown that TAF is metabolized to tenofovir by cathepsin A in PBMCs and macrophages; and by CES1 in hepatocytes. Upon coadministration with the moderate CYP3A inducer probe efavirenz, TAF exposure was unaffected. (PBMCs) CES1 (hepatocytes) CYP3A (minimal) Elimination Major route of elimination Metabolism Glomerular filtration and active tubular secretion Metabolism (>80% of oral dose) t 1/2 (h) t 1/2 values refer to median terminal plasma half-life. Note that the pharmacologically active metabolite, tenofovir diphosphate, has a half-life of 150–180 hours within PBMCs. 50 10 0.51 % Of dose excreted in urine Dosing in mass balance studies: FTC (single dose administration of [ 14 C] emtricitabine after multiple dosing of emtricitabine for ten days); TAF (single dose administration of [ 14 C] tenofovir alafenamide). 6 70 <1 % Of dose excreted in feces 85 13.7 31.7 Table 5 Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Emtricitabine, Rilpivirine, Tenofovir Alafenamide and its Metabolite Tenofovir Following Oral Administration with a Meal in HIV-Infected Adults Parameter Mean (CV%) Emtricitabine From Intensive PK analysis in a phase 2 trial in HIV infected adults treated with FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI (n=19). Rilpivirine From Population PK analysis in a trial of treatment-naïve adults with HIV-1 infection treated with RPV (n=679). Tenofovir Alafenamide From Population PK analysis in two trials of treatment-naïve adults with HIV-1 infection treated within EVG+COBI+FTC+TAF (n=539). Tenofovir From Population PK analysis in two trials of treatment-naïve adults with HIV-1 infection treated with EVG+COBI+FTC+TAF (n=841). CV = Coefficient of Variation; NA = Not Applicable C max (microgram per mL) 2.1 (20.2) NA 0.16 (51.1) 0.02 (26.1) AUC tau (microgram∙hour per mL) 11.7 (16.6) 2.2 (38.1) 0.21 (71.8) 0.29 (27.4) C trough (microgram per mL) 0.10 (46.7) 0.08 (44.3) NA 0.01 (28.5) Specific Populations Geriatric Patients The pharmacokinetics of FTC and TAF have not been fully evaluated in the elderly (65 years of age and older). Population pharmacokinetics analysis of HIV-infected subjects in Phase 2 and Phase 3 trials of FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI showed that age did not have a clinically relevant effect on exposures of TAF up to 75 years of age. The pharmacokinetics of RPV have not been fully evaluated in the elderly (65 years of age and older) [see Use in Specific Populations (8.5) ]. Pediatric Patients Exposures of TAF in 24 pediatric subjects with HIV-1 infection aged 12 to less than 18 years who received FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI were decreased (23% for TAF AUC) compared to exposures achieved in treatment-naïve adults following administration of FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI. These exposure differences are not thought to be clinically significant based on exposure-response relationships. FTC exposures were similar in adolescents compared to treatment-naïve adults. The PK of RPV in antiretroviral HIV-1-infected pediatric subjects 12 to less than 18 years of age who received RPV 25 mg once daily were comparable to those in HIV-1 infected adults. As in adults, there was no impact of body weight on RPV PK in pediatric subjects [see Use In Specific Populations (8.4) ] . Race and Gender No clinically significant changes in the pharmacokinetics of the components of ODEFSEY have been observed based on race or gender. Patients with Renal Impairment Rilpivirine: Population pharmacokinetic analysis indicated that RPV exposure was similar in HIV-1 infected subjects with eGFR 60 to 89 mL per minute by Cockcroft-Gault method relative to HIV-1 infected subjects with normal renal function. There is limited or no information regarding the pharmacokinetics of RPV in patients with moderate or severe renal impairment or in patients with end-stage renal disease [see Use in Specific Populations (8.6) ] . Emtricitabine and Tenofovir Alafenamide: The pharmacokinetics of FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI in HIV-1 infected subjects with renal impairment (eGFR 30 to 69 mL per minute by Cockcroft-Gault method), and in HIV-1 infected subjects with ESRD (estimated creatinine clearance of less than 15 mL per minute by Cockcroft-Gault method) receiving chronic hemodialysis were evaluated in subsets of virologically-suppressed subjects in open-label trials. The pharmacokinetics of TAF were similar among healthy subjects, subjects with mild or moderate renal impairment, and subjects with ESRD receiving chronic hemodialysis; increases in FTC and TFV exposures in subjects with renal impairment were not considered clinically relevant (Table 6). Table 6 Pharmacokinetics of FTC and a Metabolite of TAF (Tenofovir) in HIV-Infected Adults with Renal Impairment as Compared to Subjects with Normal Renal Function AUC tau (microgram-hour per mL) Mean (CV%) Estimated Creatinine Clearance By Cockcroft-Gault method. ≥90 mL per minute (N=18) From a phase 2 trial in HIV-infected adults with normal renal function treated with FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI. 60–89 mL per minute (N=11) These subjects had an eGFR ranging from 60 to 69 mL per minute. 30–59 mL per minute (N=18) From a phase 3 trial in HIV infected adults with renal impairment treated with FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI. <15 mL per minute (N=12) From a phase 3 trial in HIV infected adults with ESRD receiving chronic hemodialysis treated with FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI; PK assessed prior to hemodialysis following 3 consecutive daily doses of FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI. Emtricitabine 11.4 (11.9) 17.6 (18.2) 23.0 (23.6) 62.9 (48.0) N=11. Tenofovir 0.32 (14.9) 0.46 (31.5) 0.61 (28.4) 8.72 (39.4) N=10. Patients with Hepatic Impairment Emtricitabine: The pharmacokinetics of FTC have not been studied in subjects with hepatic impairment; however, FTC is not significantly metabolized by liver enzymes, so the impact of hepatic impairment should be limited. Rilpivirine: In a study comparing 8 subjects with mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score A) to 8 matched controls and 8 subjects with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score B) to 8 matched controls, the multiple-dose exposure of RPV was 47% higher in subjects with mild hepatic impairment and 5% higher in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment [see Use in Specific Populations (8.7) ] . Tenofovir Alafenamide: Clinically relevant changes in the pharmacokinetics of tenofovir alafenamide or its metabolite tenofovir were not observed in subjects with mild, moderate, (Child-Pugh A and B) or severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh C) [see Use in Specific Populations (8.7) ] . Hepatitis B and/or Hepatitis C Virus Coinfection The pharmacokinetics of FTC and TAF have not been fully evaluated in subjects coinfected with hepatitis B and/or C virus. Population pharmacokinetic analysis indicated that hepatitis B and/or C virus coinfection had no clinically relevant effect on the exposure of RPV. Pregnancy and Postpartum Rilpivirine: The exposure (C 0h and AUC 24h ) to total RPV after intake of RPV 25 mg once daily as part of an antiretroviral regimen was 30 to 40% lower during pregnancy (similar for the second and third trimester), compared with postpartum (see Table 7 ). However, the exposure during pregnancy was not significantly different from exposures obtained in Phase 3 trials of RPV-containing regimens. Based on the exposure-response relationship for RPV, this decrease is not considered clinically relevant in patients who are virologically suppressed. The protein binding of RPV was similar (>99%) during the second trimester, third trimester, and postpartum. Table 7 Pharmacokinetic Results of Total Rilpivirine After Administration of Rilpivirine 25 mg Once Daily as Part of an Antiretroviral Regimen, During the 2nd Trimester of Pregnancy, the 3rd Trimester of Pregnancy and Postpartum Pharmacokinetics of total rilpivirine (mean ± SD, t max : median [range]) Postpartum (6–12 Weeks) (n=11) 2 nd Trimester of pregnancy (n=15) 3 rd Trimester of pregnancy (n=13) C 0h , ng/mL 111 ± 69.2 65.0 ± 23.9 63.5 ± 26.2 C min , ng/mL 84.0 ± 58.8 54.3 ± 25.8 52.9 ± 24.4 C max , ng/mL 167 ± 101 121 ± 45.9 123 ± 47.5 t max , h 4.00 (2.03–25.08) 4.00 (1.00–9.00) 4.00 (2.00–24.93) AUC 24h , ng.h/mL 2714 ± 1535 1792 ± 711 1762 ± 662 Drug Interaction Studies Rilpivirine: RPV is primarily metabolized by CYP3A, and drugs that induce or inhibit CYP3A may thus affect the clearance of RPV. RPV at a dose of 25 mg once daily is not likely to have a clinically relevant effect on the exposure of medicinal products metabolized by CYP enzymes. TAF is not an inhibitor of CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, or UGT1A1. TAF is a weak inhibitor of CYP3A in vitro. TAF is not an inhibitor or inducer of CYP3A in vivo. The drug interaction studies described in Tables 8–11 were conducted with ODEFSEY (FTC/RPV/TAF) or the components of ODEFSEY (FTC, RPV, or TAF) administered individually. The effects of coadministered drugs on the exposures of RPV and TAF are shown in Tables 8 and 9, respectively. The effects of RPV and TAF on the exposure of coadministered drugs are shown in Tables 10 and 11, respectively. For information regarding clinical recommendations, see Drug Interactions (7) . Table 8 Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameters for RPV in the Presence of Coadministered Drugs in Healthy Subjects Coadministered Drug Dose/Schedule Mean Ratio of RPV Pharmacokinetic Parameters With/Without Coadministered Drug (90% CI); No Effect = 1.00 Coadministered Drug (mg) RPV (mg) N C max AUC C min CI=Confidence Interval; N=maximum number of subjects with data; NA=Not Available; ↔=no change Acetaminophen 500 single dose 150 once daily 25 mg, 75 mg, and 150 mg of RPV is 1, 3, and 6 times the recommended dose of RPV in ODEFSEY, respectively. 16 1.09 (1.01, 1.18) 1.16 (1.10, 1.22) 1.26 (1.16, 1.38) Atorvastatin 40 once daily 150 once daily 16 0.91 (0.79, 1.06) 0.90 (0.81, 0.99) 0.90 (0.84, 0.96) Chlorzoxazone 500 single dose taken 2 hours after RPV 150 once daily 16 1.17 (1.08, 1.27) 1.25 (1.16, 1.35) 1.18 (1.09, 1.28) Ethinylestradiol/Norethindrone 0.035 once daily /1 mg once daily 25 once daily Study conducted with RPV. 15 ↔ Comparison based on historic controls. ↔ ↔ Famotidine 40 single dose taken 12 hours before RPV 150 single dose 24 0.99 (0.84, 1.16) 0.91 (0.78, 1.07) NA Famotidine 40 single dose taken 2 hours before RPV 150 single dose 23 0.15 (0.12, 0.19) 0.24 (0.20, 0.28) NA Famotidine 40 single dose taken 4 hours after RPV 150 single dose 24 1.21 (1.06, 1.39) 1.13 (1.01, 1.27) NA Ketoconazole 400 once daily 150 once daily 15 1.30 (1.13, 1.48) 1.49 (1.31, 1.70) 1.76 (1.57, 1.97) Methadone 60–100 once daily, individualized dose 25 once daily 12 ↔ ↔ ↔ Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir 90/400 once daily 25 once daily Study conducted with ODEFSEY (FTC/RPV/TAF). 42 0.97 (0.92, 1.02) 0.95 (0.91, 0.98) 0.93 (0.89, 0.97) Omeprazole 20 once daily 25 single dose 15 0.30 (0.24, 0.38) 0.35 (0.28, 0.44) NA Rifabutin 300 once daily 25 once daily 18 0.69 (0.62, 0.76) 0.58 (0.52, 0.65) 0.52 (0.46, 0.59) Rifampin 600 once daily 150 once daily 16 0.31 (0.27, 0.36) 0.20 (0.18, 0.23) 0.11 (0.10, 0.13) Simeprevir 25 once daily 150 once daily 23 1.04 (0.95, 1.30) 1.12 (1.05, 1.19) 1.25 (1.16, 1.35) Sildenafil 50 single dose 75 once daily 16 0.92 (0.85, 0.99) 0.98 (0.92, 1.05) 1.04 (0.98, 1.09) Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir 400/100 once daily 10 once daily Study conducted with FTC/RPV/TDF. 24 0.93 (0.88,0.98) 0.95 (0.90, 1.00) 0.96 (0.90,1.03) Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir 400/100/100 + 100 voxilaprevir Study conducted with additional voxilaprevir 100 mg to achieve voxilaprevir exposures expected in HCV-infected patients. once daily 25 once daily 30 0.79 (0.74, 0.84) 0.80 (0.76, 0.85) 0.82 (0.77, 0.87) Table 9 Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameters for TAF in the Presence of the Coadministered Drug All interaction studies conducted in healthy volunteers. in Healthy Subjects Coadministered Drug Dose of Coadministered Drug (mg) TAF (mg) N Mean Ratio of Tenofovir Alafenamide Pharmacokinetic Parameters (90% CI); No Effect = 1.00 C max AUC C min CI=Confidence Interval; N=maximum number of subjects with data; NA=Not Available Cobicistat Increases TAF exposure via inhibition of intestinal P-glycoprotein. 150 once daily 8 once daily 12 2.83 (2.20, 3.65) 2.65 (2.29, 3.07) NA Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir 90/400 once daily 25 once daily Study conducted with ODEFSEY (FTC/RPV/TAF). 42 1.03 (0.94, 1.14) 1.32 (1.25, 1.40) NA Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir 400/100/100 + 100 voxilaprevir Study conducted with additional voxilaprevir 100 mg to achieve voxilaprevir exposures expected in HCV-infected patients. once daily 25 once daily 30 1.32 (1.17, 1.48) 1.52 (1.43,1.61) NA Table 10 Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Coadministered Drugs in the Presence of RPV in Healthy Subjects Coadministered Drug Dose/Schedule Mean Ratio of Coadministered Drug Pharmacokinetic Parameters With/Without RPV (90% CI); No Effect = 1.00 Coadministered Drug (mg) RPV (mg) N C max AUC C min CI=Confidence Interval; N=maximum number of subjects with data; NA=Not Available Acetaminophen 500 single dose 150 once daily 25 mg, 75 mg, and 150 mg of RPV is 1, 3, and 6 times the recommended dose of RPV in ODEFSEY, respectively. 16 0.97 (0.86, 1.10) 0.92 (0.85, 0.99) NA Atorvastatin 40 once daily 150 once daily 16 1.35 (1.08, 1.68) 1.04 (0.97, 1.12) 0.85 (0.69, 1.03) 2-hydroxy-atorvastatin 1.58 (1.33, 1.87) 1.39 (1.29, 1.50) 1.32 (1.10, 1.58) 4-hydroxy-atorvastatin 1.28 (1.15, 1.43) 1.23 (1.13, 1.33) NA Chlorzoxazone 500 single dose taken 2 hours after RPV 150 once daily 16 0.98 (0.85, 1.13) 1.03 (0.95, 1.13) NA Digoxin 0.5 single dose 25 once daily Study conducted with RPV. 22 1.06 (0.97, 1.17) 0.98 (0.93, 1.04) AUC (0–last) . NA Ethinylestradiol 0.035 once daily 25 once daily 17 1.17 (1.06, 1.30) 1.14 (1.10, 1.19) 1.09 (1.03, 1.16) Norethindrone 1 mg once daily 0.94 (0.83, 1.06) 0.89 (0.84, 0.94) 0.99 (0.90, 1.08) Ketoconazole 400 once daily 150 once daily 14 0.85 (0.80, 0.90) 0.76 (0.70, 0.82) 0.34 (0.25, 0.46) Ledipasvir 90 once daily 25 once daily Study conducted with ODEFSEY (FTC/RPV/TAF). 41 1.01 (0.97, 1.05) 1.02 (0.97, 1.06) 1.02 (0.98, 1.07) Sofosbuvir 400 once daily 25 once daily 41 0.96 (0.89, 1.04) 1.05 (1.01, 1.09) NA GS-331007 The predominant circulating nucleoside metabolite of sofosbuvir. 1.08 (1.05, 1.11) 1.08 (1.06, 1.10) 1.10 (1.07, 1.12) R(-) methadone 60–100 once daily, individualized dose 25 once daily 13 0.86 (0.78, 0.95) 0.84 (0.74, 0.95) 0.78 (0.67, 0.91) S(+) methadone 0.87 (0.78, 0.97) 0.84 (0.74, 0.96) 0.79 (0.67, 0.92) Metformin 850 single dose 25 once daily 20 1.02 (0.95, 1.10) 0.97 (0.90,1.06) N (maximum number of subjects with data for AUC (0–∞) =15) NA Rifampin 600 once daily 150 once daily 16 1.02 (0.93, 1.12) 0.99 (0.92, 1.07) NA 25-desacetylrifampin 1.00 (0.87, 1.15) 0.91 (0.77, 1.07) NA Simeprevir 150 once daily 25 once daily 21 1.10 (0.97, 1.26) 1.06 (0.94, 1.19) 0.96 (0.83, 1.11) Sildenafil 50 single dose 75 once daily 16 0.93 (0.80, 1.08) 0.97 (0.87, 1.08) NA N -desmethyl-sildenafil 0.90 (0.80, 1.02) 0.92 (0.85, 0.99) NA Sofosbuvir GS-331007 400 once daily 25 once daily Study conducted with FTC/RPV/TDF. 24 1.09 (0.95, 1.25) 0.96 (0.90, 1.01) 1.16 (1.10, 1.24) 1.04 (1.00, 1.07) NA 1.12 (1.07, 1.17) Velpatasvir 100 once daily 25 once daily 24 0.96 (0.85, 1.10) 0.99 (0.88, 1.11) 1.02 (0.91, 1.15) Sofosbuvir 400 once daily 25 once daily 30 0.95 (0.86, 1.05) 1.01 (0.97, 1.06) NA GS-331007 1.02 (0.98, 1.06) 1.04 (1.01, 1.06) NA Velpatasvir 100 once daily 25 once daily 30 1.05 (0.96, 1.16) 1.01 (0.94, 1.07) 1.01 (0.95, 1.09) Voxilaprevir 100 + 100 once daily 25 once daily 30 0.96 (0.84, 1.11) 0.94 (0.84, 1.05) 1.02 (0.92, 1.12) Table 11 Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Coadministered Drug in the Presence of TAF in Healthy Subjects Coadministered Drug Dose of Coadministered Drug (mg) TAF (mg) N Mean Ratio of Coadministered Drug Pharmacokinetic Parameters (90% CI); No Effect = 1.00 C max AUC C min CI=Confidence Interval; N=maximum number of subjects with data; NA=Not Available Midazolam A sensitive CYP3A4 substrate. 2.5 single dose, orally 25 once daily Study conducted with TAF. 18 1.02 (0.92, 1.13) 1.13 (1.04, 1.23) NA 1 single dose, IV 0.99 (0.89, 1.11) 1.08 (1.04, 1.13) NA Ledipasvir Study conducted with ODEFSEY (FTC/RPV/TAF). 90/400 once daily 25 once daily 41 1.01 (0.97, 1.05) 1.02 (0.97, 1.06) 1.02 (0.98,1.07) Sofosbuvir 0.96 (0.89, 1.04) 1.05 (1.01, 1.09) NA GS-331007 , The predominant circulating nucleoside metabolite of sofosbuvir. 1.08 (1.05, 1.11) 1.08 (1.06, 1.10) 1.10 (1.07, 1.12) Norelgestromin norgestimate 0.180/0.215/0.250 once daily/ethinyl estradiol 0.025 once daily 25 once daily Study conducted with FTC/TAF. 29 1.17 (1.07,1.26) 1.12 (1.07, 1.17) 1.16 (1.08,1.24) Norgestrel 1.10 (1.02, 1.18) 1.09 (1.01, 1.18) 1.11 (1.03,1.20) Ethinyl estradiol 1.22 (1.15, 1.29) 1.11 (1.07, 1.16) 1.02 (0.93,1.12) Sofosbuvir 400 once daily 25 once daily 30 0.95 (0.86, 1.05) 1.01 (0.97, 1.06) NA GS-331007 1.02 (0.98, 1.06) 1.04 (1.01, 1.06) NA Velpatasvir 100 once daily 1.05 (0.96, 1.16) 1.01 (0.94, 1.07) 1.01 (0.95,1.09) Voxilaprevir 100 + 100 once daily 0.96 (0.84, 1.11) 0.94 (0.84, 1.05) 1.02 (0.92,1.12) 12.4 Microbiology Mechanism of Action Emtricitabine: FTC, a synthetic nucleoside analog of cytidine, is phosphorylated by cellular enzymes to form emtricitabine 5'-triphosphate. Emtricitabine 5'-triphosphate inhibits the activity of the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) by competing with the natural substrate deoxycytidine 5'-triphosphate and by being incorporated into nascent viral DNA which results in chain termination. Emtricitabine 5′-triphosphate is a weak inhibitor of mammalian DNA polymerases α, β, Ɛ, and mitochondrial DNA polymerase γ. Rilpivirine: RPV is a diarylpyrimidine non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor of HIV-1 and inhibits HIV-1 replication by non-competitive inhibition of HIV-1 RT. RPV does not inhibit the human cellular DNA polymerases α, β, and mitochondrial DNA polymerase γ. Tenofovir Alafenamide: TAF is a phosphonamidate prodrug of tenofovir (2'-deoxyadenosine monophosphate analog). Plasma exposure to TAF allows for permeation into cells and then TAF is intracellularly converted to tenofovir through hydrolysis by cathepsin A. Tenofovir is subsequently phosphorylated by cellular kinases to the active metabolite tenofovir diphosphate. Tenofovir diphosphate inhibits HIV-1 replication through incorporation into viral DNA by the HIV reverse transcriptase, which results in DNA chain termination. Tenofovir has activity against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1). Cell culture studies have shown that both tenofovir and FTC can be fully phosphorylated when combined in cells. Tenofovir diphosphate is a weak inhibitor of mammalian DNA polymerases that include mitochondrial DNA polymerase γ and there is no evidence of toxicity to mitochondria cell culture. Antiviral Activity in Cell Culture Emtricitabine, Rilpivirine, and Tenofovir Alafenamide: The combinations of FTC, RPV, and TAF were not antagonistic with each other in cell culture combination antiviral activity assays. In addition, FTC, RPV, and TAF were not antagonistic with a panel of representatives from the major classes of approved anti-HIV agents (NNRTIs, NRTIs, INSTIs, and PIs). Emtricitabine: The antiviral activity of FTC against laboratory and clinical isolates of HIV-1 was assessed in T lymphoblastoid cell lines, the MAGI-CCR5 cell line, and primary peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). The EC 50 values for FTC were in the range of 0.0013–0.64 microM. FTC displayed antiviral activity in cell culture against HIV-1 clades A, B, C, D, E, F, and G (EC 50 values ranged from 0.007–0.075 microM) and showed strain-specific activity against HIV-2 (EC 50 values ranged from 0.007–1.5 microM). Rilpivirine: RPV exhibited activity against laboratory strains of wild-type HIV-1 in an acutely infected T-cell line with a median EC 50 value for HIV-1 IIIB of 0.73 nM. RPV demonstrated limited activity in cell culture against HIV-2 with a median EC 50 value of 5220 nM (range 2510–10,830 nM). RPV demonstrated antiviral activity against a broad panel of HIV-1 group M (subtype A, B, C, D, F, G, H) primary isolates with EC 50 values ranging from 0.07–1.01 nM and was less active against group O primary isolates with EC 50 values ranging from 2.88–8.45 nM. Tenofovir Alafenamide: The antiviral activity of TAF against laboratory and clinical isolates of HIV-1 subtype B was assessed in lymphoblastoid cell lines, PBMCs, primary monocyte/macrophage cells and CD4-T lymphocytes. The EC 50 values for TAF ranged from 2.0–14.7 nM. TAF displayed antiviral activity in cell culture against all HIV-1 groups (M, N, O), including sub-types A, B, C, D, E, F, and G (EC 50 values ranged from 0.10–12.0 nM) and strain specific activity against HIV-2 (EC 50 values ranged from 0.91–2.63 nM). Resistance In Cell Culture Emtricitabine: HIV-1 isolates with reduced susceptibility to FTC were selected in cell culture. Reduced susceptibility to FTC was associated with M184V or I substitutions in HIV-1 RT. Rilpivirine: RPV-resistant strains were selected in cell culture starting from wild-type HIV-1 of different origins and subtypes as well as NNRTI-resistant HIV-1. The frequently observed amino acid substitutions that emerged and conferred decreased phenotypic susceptibility to RPV included: L100I, K101E, V106I and A, V108I, E138K and G, Q, R, V179F and I, Y181C and I, V189I, G190E, H221Y, F227C, and M230I and L. Tenofovir Alafenamide: HIV-1 isolates with reduced susceptibility to TAF were selected in cell culture. HIV-1 isolates selected by TAF expressed a K65R substitution in HIV-1 RT, sometimes in the presence of S68N or L429I substitutions; in addition, a K70E substitution in HIV-1 RT was observed. In Clinical Trials In HIV-1-Infected Subjects With No Antiretroviral Treatment History Emtricitabine and Tenofovir Alafenamide: The resistance profile of ODEFSEY for the treatment of HIV-1 infection is based on studies of FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI in the treatment of HIV-1 infection . In a pooled analysis of antiretroviral-naïve subjects, genotyping was performed on plasma HIV-1 isolates from all subjects with HIV-1 RNA greater than 400 copies per mL at confirmed virologic failure, at Week 48, or at time of early study drug discontinuation. Genotypic resistance developed in 7 of 14 evaluable subjects. The resistance–associated substitutions that emerged were M184V/I (N=7) and K65R (N=1). Three subjects had virus with emergent R, H, or E at the polymorphic Q207 residue in reverse transcriptase. Rilpivirine: In the Week 96 pooled resistance analysis for adult subjects receiving RPV or efavirenz in combination with FTC/TDF, the emergence of resistance was greater among subjects' viruses in the RPV+FTC/TDF arm compared to the efavirenz+FTC/TDF arm and was dependent on baseline viral load. In the Week 96 resistance analysis, 14% (77/550) of the subjects in the RPV+FTC/TDF arm and 8% (43/546) of the subjects in the efavirenz+FTC/TDF arm qualified for resistance analysis; 61% (47/77) of the subjects who qualified for resistance analysis (resistance-analysis subjects) in the RPV+FTC/TDF arm had virus with genotypic and/or phenotypic resistance to RPV compared to 42% (18/43) of the resistance-analysis subjects in the efavirenz+FTC/TDF arm who had genotypic and/or phenotypic resistance to efavirenz. Moreover, genotypic and/or phenotypic resistance to emtricitabine or tenofovir emerged in viruses from 57% (44/77) of the resistance-analysis subjects in the RPV arm compared to 26% (11/43) in the efavirenz arm. Emerging NNRTI substitutions in the RPV resistance analysis of subjects' viruses included V90I, K101E/P/T, E138K/A/Q/G, V179I/L, Y181C/I, V189I, H221Y, F227C/L, and M230L, which were associated with an RPV phenotypic fold change range of 2.6–621. The E138K substitution emerged most frequently during RPV treatment, commonly in combination with the M184I substitution. The emtricitabine and lamivudine resistance-associated substitutions M184I or V and NRTI resistance-associated substitutions (K65R/N, A62V, D67N/G, K70E, Y115F, K219E/R) emerged more frequently in the RPV resistance-analysis subjects than in efavirenz resistance-analysis subjects . NNRTI- and NRTI-resistance substitutions emerged less frequently in the resistance analysis of viruses from subjects with baseline viral loads of less than or equal to 100,000 copies/mL compared to viruses from subjects with baseline viral loads of greater than 100,000 copies/mL: 23% (10/44) compared to 77% (34/44) of NNRTI-resistance substitutions and 20% (9/44) compared to 80% (35/44) of NRTI-resistance substitutions. This difference was also observed for the individual emtricitabine/lamivudine and tenofovir resistance substitutions: 22% (9/41) compared to 78% (32/41) for M184I/V and 0% (0/8) compared to 100% (8/8) for K65R/N. Additionally, NNRTI and/or NRTI-resistance substitutions emerged less frequently in the resistance analysis of the viruses from subjects with baseline CD4+ cell counts greater than or equal to 200 cells/mm 3 compared to the viruses from subjects with baseline CD4+ cell counts less than 200 cells/mm 3 : 32% (14/44) compared to 68% (30/44) of NNRTI-resistance substitutions and 27% (12/44) compared to 73% (32/44) of NRTI-resistance substitutions. In Virologically-Suppressed Subjects Emtricitabine and Tenofovir Alafenamide: One subject was identified with emergent resistance to FTC or TAF (M184M/I) out of 4 virologic failure subjects in a clinical study of virologically-suppressed subjects who switched from a regimen containing FTC+TDF to FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI (N=799). Rilpivirine: Through Week 48, 4 subjects who switched their protease inhibitor-based regimen to FTC/RPV/TDF (4 of 469 subjects, 0.9%) and 1 subject who maintained their regimen (1 of 159 subjects, 0.6%) developed genotypic and/or phenotypic resistance to a study drug. All 4 of the subjects who had resistance emergence on FTC/RPV/TDF had evidence of FTC resistance and 3 of the subjects had evidence of RPV resistance. ODEFSEY: Through Week 48, in subjects who switched to ODEFSEY from FTC/RPV/TDF or EFV/FTC/TDF (Trials 1216 (N=316) and 1160 (N=438), respectively), of seven subjects who developed virologic failure, three subjects had detectable NNRTI and/or NRTI resistance substitutions at virologic failure that were pre-existing in the baseline sample by proviral DNA sequencing; one of these subjects resuppressed while maintaining ODEFSEY. Cross-Resistance Emtricitabine: FTC-resistant viruses with the M184V/I substitution were cross-resistant to lamivudine, but retained sensitivity to didanosine, stavudine, tenofovir, and zidovudine. Viruses harboring substitutions conferring reduced susceptibility to stavudine and zidovudine—thymidine analog substitutions (M41L, D67N, K70R, L210W, T215Y/F, K219Q/E), or didanosine (L74V) remained sensitive to FTC. HIV-1 containing the K103N substitution or other substitutions associated with resistance to NNRTIs was susceptible to FTC. Rilpivirine: Considering all of the available cell culture and clinical data, any of the following amino acid substitutions, when present at baseline, are likely to decrease the antiviral activity of RPV: K101E, K101P, E138A, E138G, E138K, E138R, E138Q, V179L, Y181C, Y181I, Y181V, Y188L, H221Y, F227C, M230I, M230L, and the combination of L100I+K103N. Cross-resistance in site-directed mutant virus has been observed among NNRTIs. The single NNRTI substitutions K101P, Y181I, and Y181V conferred 52 times, 15 times, and 12 times decreased susceptibility to RPV, respectively. The combination of E138K and M184I showed 6.7 times reduced susceptibility to RPV compared to 2.8 times for E138K alone. The K103N substitution did not show reduced susceptibility to RPV by itself. However, the combination of K103N and L100I resulted in a 7 times reduced susceptibility to RPV. In another study, the Y188L substitution resulted in a reduced susceptibility to RPV of 9 times for clinical isolates and 6 times for site-directed mutants. Combinations of 2 or 3 NNRTI resistance-associated substitutions gave decreased susceptibility to RPV (fold change range of 3.7–554) in 38% and 66% of mutants, respectively. Cross-resistance to efavirenz, etravirine, and/or nevirapine is likely after virologic failure and development of RPV resistance. Tenofovir Alafenamide: Tenofovir resistance substitutions K65R and K70E result in reduced susceptibility to abacavir, didanosine, emtricitabine, lamivudine, and tenofovir. HIV-1 with multiple thymidine analog substitutions (M41L, D67N, K70R, L210W, T215F/Y, K219Q/E/N/R), or multinucleoside resistant HIV-1 with a T69S double insertion mutation or with a Q151M substitution complex including K65R showed reduced susceptibility to TAF in cell culture.

12.1 Mechanism of Action ODEFSEY is a fixed dose combination of antiretroviral drugs emtricitabine, rilpivirine, and tenofovir alafenamide [see Microbiology (12.4) ] .

12.2 Pharmacodynamics Cardiac Electrophysiology When higher than recommended RPV doses of 75 mg (3 times the recommended dosage in ODEFSEY) once daily and 300 mg (12 times the recommended dosage in ODEFSEY) once daily were studied in healthy adults, the maximum mean time-matched (95% upper confidence bound) differences in QTcF interval from placebo after baseline correction were 10.7 (15.3) and 23.3 (28.4) milliseconds, respectively. Steady-state administration of RPV 75 mg once daily and 300 mg once daily resulted in a mean steady-state C max approximately 2.6 times and 6.7 times, respectively, higher than the mean C max observed with the recommended 25 mg once daily dose of RPV [see Warnings and Precautions (5.6) ] . The effect of RPV at the recommended dose of 25 mg once daily on the QTcF interval was evaluated in a randomized, placebo-, and active- (moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily) controlled crossover study in 60 healthy adults, with 13 measurements over 24 hours at steady state. The maximum mean time-matched (95% upper confidence bound) differences in QTcF interval from placebo after baseline correction was 2 (5) milliseconds (i.e., below the threshold of clinical concern). In a thorough QT/QTc study in 48 healthy subjects, TAF at the recommended dose and at a dose approximately 5 times the recommended dose, did not affect the QT/QTc interval and did not prolong the PR interval. The effect of FTC on the QT interval is not known.

12.3 Pharmacokinetics Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion The pharmacokinetic properties of the components of ODEFSEY are provided in Table 4. The multiple dose pharmacokinetic parameters of FTC, RPV and TAF and its metabolite tenofovir are provided in Table 5. Table 4 Pharmacokinetic Properties of the Components of ODEFSEY Rilpivirine Emtricitabine Tenofovir Alafenamide PBMCs = peripheral blood mononuclear cells; CES1 = carboxylesterase 1. Absorption T max (h) 4 3 1 Effect of moderate fat meal (relative to fasting) Values refer to geometric mean ratio [fed/ fasted] in PK parameters and (90% confidence interval). High-calorie/high-fat meal = ~800 kcal, 50% fat. Moderate-fat meal = ~600 kcal, 27% fat. AUC Ratio = 1.13 (1.03, 1.23) AUC Ratio = 0.91 (0.89, 0.93) AUC Ratio = 1.45 (1.33, 1.58) Effect of high fat meal (relative to fasting) AUC Ratio = 1.72 (1.49, 1.99) AUC Ratio = 0.88 (0.85, 0.90) AUC Ratio = 1.53 (1.39, 1.69) Distribution % Bound to human plasma proteins ~99 <4 ~80 Source of protein binding data In vitro In vitro Ex vivo Blood-to-plasma ratio 0.7 0.6 1.0 Metabolism Metabolism CYP3A Not significantly metabolized Cathepsin A In vivo, TAF is hydrolyzed within cells to form tenofovir (major metabolite), which is phosphorylated to the active metabolite, tenofovir diphosphate. In vitro studies have shown that TAF is metabolized to tenofovir by cathepsin A in PBMCs and macrophages; and by CES1 in hepatocytes. Upon coadministration with the moderate CYP3A inducer probe efavirenz, TAF exposure was unaffected. (PBMCs) CES1 (hepatocytes) CYP3A (minimal) Elimination Major route of elimination Metabolism Glomerular filtration and active tubular secretion Metabolism (>80% of oral dose) t 1/2 (h) t 1/2 values refer to median terminal plasma half-life. Note that the pharmacologically active metabolite, tenofovir diphosphate, has a half-life of 150–180 hours within PBMCs. 50 10 0.51 % Of dose excreted in urine Dosing in mass balance studies: FTC (single dose administration of [ 14 C] emtricitabine after multiple dosing of emtricitabine for ten days); TAF (single dose administration of [ 14 C] tenofovir alafenamide). 6 70 <1 % Of dose excreted in feces 85 13.7 31.7 Table 5 Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Emtricitabine, Rilpivirine, Tenofovir Alafenamide and its Metabolite Tenofovir Following Oral Administration with a Meal in HIV-Infected Adults Parameter Mean (CV%) Emtricitabine From Intensive PK analysis in a phase 2 trial in HIV infected adults treated with FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI (n=19). Rilpivirine From Population PK analysis in a trial of treatment-naïve adults with HIV-1 infection treated with RPV (n=679). Tenofovir Alafenamide From Population PK analysis in two trials of treatment-naïve adults with HIV-1 infection treated within EVG+COBI+FTC+TAF (n=539). Tenofovir From Population PK analysis in two trials of treatment-naïve adults with HIV-1 infection treated with EVG+COBI+FTC+TAF (n=841). CV = Coefficient of Variation; NA = Not Applicable C max (microgram per mL) 2.1 (20.2) NA 0.16 (51.1) 0.02 (26.1) AUC tau (microgram∙hour per mL) 11.7 (16.6) 2.2 (38.1) 0.21 (71.8) 0.29 (27.4) C trough (microgram per mL) 0.10 (46.7) 0.08 (44.3) NA 0.01 (28.5) Specific Populations Geriatric Patients The pharmacokinetics of FTC and TAF have not been fully evaluated in the elderly (65 years of age and older). Population pharmacokinetics analysis of HIV-infected subjects in Phase 2 and Phase 3 trials of FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI showed that age did not have a clinically relevant effect on exposures of TAF up to 75 years of age. The pharmacokinetics of RPV have not been fully evaluated in the elderly (65 years of age and older) [see Use in Specific Populations (8.5) ]. Pediatric Patients Exposures of TAF in 24 pediatric subjects with HIV-1 infection aged 12 to less than 18 years who received FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI were decreased (23% for TAF AUC) compared to exposures achieved in treatment-naïve adults following administration of FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI. These exposure differences are not thought to be clinically significant based on exposure-response relationships. FTC exposures were similar in adolescents compared to treatment-naïve adults. The PK of RPV in antiretroviral HIV-1-infected pediatric subjects 12 to less than 18 years of age who received RPV 25 mg once daily were comparable to those in HIV-1 infected adults. As in adults, there was no impact of body weight on RPV PK in pediatric subjects [see Use In Specific Populations (8.4) ] . Race and Gender No clinically significant changes in the pharmacokinetics of the components of ODEFSEY have been observed based on race or gender. Patients with Renal Impairment Rilpivirine: Population pharmacokinetic analysis indicated that RPV exposure was similar in HIV-1 infected subjects with eGFR 60 to 89 mL per minute by Cockcroft-Gault method relative to HIV-1 infected subjects with normal renal function. There is limited or no information regarding the pharmacokinetics of RPV in patients with moderate or severe renal impairment or in patients with end-stage renal disease [see Use in Specific Populations (8.6) ] . Emtricitabine and Tenofovir Alafenamide: The pharmacokinetics of FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI in HIV-1 infected subjects with renal impairment (eGFR 30 to 69 mL per minute by Cockcroft-Gault method), and in HIV-1 infected subjects with ESRD (estimated creatinine clearance of less than 15 mL per minute by Cockcroft-Gault method) receiving chronic hemodialysis were evaluated in subsets of virologically-suppressed subjects in open-label trials. The pharmacokinetics of TAF were similar among healthy subjects, subjects with mild or moderate renal impairment, and subjects with ESRD receiving chronic hemodialysis; increases in FTC and TFV exposures in subjects with renal impairment were not considered clinically relevant (Table 6). Table 6 Pharmacokinetics of FTC and a Metabolite of TAF (Tenofovir) in HIV-Infected Adults with Renal Impairment as Compared to Subjects with Normal Renal Function AUC tau (microgram-hour per mL) Mean (CV%) Estimated Creatinine Clearance By Cockcroft-Gault method. ≥90 mL per minute (N=18) From a phase 2 trial in HIV-infected adults with normal renal function treated with FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI. 60–89 mL per minute (N=11) These subjects had an eGFR ranging from 60 to 69 mL per minute. 30–59 mL per minute (N=18) From a phase 3 trial in HIV infected adults with renal impairment treated with FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI. <15 mL per minute (N=12) From a phase 3 trial in HIV infected adults with ESRD receiving chronic hemodialysis treated with FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI; PK assessed prior to hemodialysis following 3 consecutive daily doses of FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI. Emtricitabine 11.4 (11.9) 17.6 (18.2) 23.0 (23.6) 62.9 (48.0) N=11. Tenofovir 0.32 (14.9) 0.46 (31.5) 0.61 (28.4) 8.72 (39.4) N=10. Patients with Hepatic Impairment Emtricitabine: The pharmacokinetics of FTC have not been studied in subjects with hepatic impairment; however, FTC is not significantly metabolized by liver enzymes, so the impact of hepatic impairment should be limited. Rilpivirine: In a study comparing 8 subjects with mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score A) to 8 matched controls and 8 subjects with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score B) to 8 matched controls, the multiple-dose exposure of RPV was 47% higher in subjects with mild hepatic impairment and 5% higher in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment [see Use in Specific Populations (8.7) ] . Tenofovir Alafenamide: Clinically relevant changes in the pharmacokinetics of tenofovir alafenamide or its metabolite tenofovir were not observed in subjects with mild, moderate, (Child-Pugh A and B) or severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh C) [see Use in Specific Populations (8.7) ] . Hepatitis B and/or Hepatitis C Virus Coinfection The pharmacokinetics of FTC and TAF have not been fully evaluated in subjects coinfected with hepatitis B and/or C virus. Population pharmacokinetic analysis indicated that hepatitis B and/or C virus coinfection had no clinically relevant effect on the exposure of RPV. Pregnancy and Postpartum Rilpivirine: The exposure (C 0h and AUC 24h ) to total RPV after intake of RPV 25 mg once daily as part of an antiretroviral regimen was 30 to 40% lower during pregnancy (similar for the second and third trimester), compared with postpartum (see Table 7 ). However, the exposure during pregnancy was not significantly different from exposures obtained in Phase 3 trials of RPV-containing regimens. Based on the exposure-response relationship for RPV, this decrease is not considered clinically relevant in patients who are virologically suppressed. The protein binding of RPV was similar (>99%) during the second trimester, third trimester, and postpartum. Table 7 Pharmacokinetic Results of Total Rilpivirine After Administration of Rilpivirine 25 mg Once Daily as Part of an Antiretroviral Regimen, During the 2nd Trimester of Pregnancy, the 3rd Trimester of Pregnancy and Postpartum Pharmacokinetics of total rilpivirine (mean ± SD, t max : median [range]) Postpartum (6–12 Weeks) (n=11) 2 nd Trimester of pregnancy (n=15) 3 rd Trimester of pregnancy (n=13) C 0h , ng/mL 111 ± 69.2 65.0 ± 23.9 63.5 ± 26.2 C min , ng/mL 84.0 ± 58.8 54.3 ± 25.8 52.9 ± 24.4 C max , ng/mL 167 ± 101 121 ± 45.9 123 ± 47.5 t max , h 4.00 (2.03–25.08) 4.00 (1.00–9.00) 4.00 (2.00–24.93) AUC 24h , ng.h/mL 2714 ± 1535 1792 ± 711 1762 ± 662 Drug Interaction Studies Rilpivirine: RPV is primarily metabolized by CYP3A, and drugs that induce or inhibit CYP3A may thus affect the clearance of RPV. RPV at a dose of 25 mg once daily is not likely to have a clinically relevant effect on the exposure of medicinal products metabolized by CYP enzymes. TAF is not an inhibitor of CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, or UGT1A1. TAF is a weak inhibitor of CYP3A in vitro. TAF is not an inhibitor or inducer of CYP3A in vivo. The drug interaction studies described in Tables 8–11 were conducted with ODEFSEY (FTC/RPV/TAF) or the components of ODEFSEY (FTC, RPV, or TAF) administered individually. The effects of coadministered drugs on the exposures of RPV and TAF are shown in Tables 8 and 9, respectively. The effects of RPV and TAF on the exposure of coadministered drugs are shown in Tables 10 and 11, respectively. For information regarding clinical recommendations, see Drug Interactions (7) . Table 8 Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameters for RPV in the Presence of Coadministered Drugs in Healthy Subjects Coadministered Drug Dose/Schedule Mean Ratio of RPV Pharmacokinetic Parameters With/Without Coadministered Drug (90% CI); No Effect = 1.00 Coadministered Drug (mg) RPV (mg) N C max AUC C min CI=Confidence Interval; N=maximum number of subjects with data; NA=Not Available; ↔=no change Acetaminophen 500 single dose 150 once daily 25 mg, 75 mg, and 150 mg of RPV is 1, 3, and 6 times the recommended dose of RPV in ODEFSEY, respectively. 16 1.09 (1.01, 1.18) 1.16 (1.10, 1.22) 1.26 (1.16, 1.38) Atorvastatin 40 once daily 150 once daily 16 0.91 (0.79, 1.06) 0.90 (0.81, 0.99) 0.90 (0.84, 0.96) Chlorzoxazone 500 single dose taken 2 hours after RPV 150 once daily 16 1.17 (1.08, 1.27) 1.25 (1.16, 1.35) 1.18 (1.09, 1.28) Ethinylestradiol/Norethindrone 0.035 once daily /1 mg once daily 25 once daily Study conducted with RPV. 15 ↔ Comparison based on historic controls. ↔ ↔ Famotidine 40 single dose taken 12 hours before RPV 150 single dose 24 0.99 (0.84, 1.16) 0.91 (0.78, 1.07) NA Famotidine 40 single dose taken 2 hours before RPV 150 single dose 23 0.15 (0.12, 0.19) 0.24 (0.20, 0.28) NA Famotidine 40 single dose taken 4 hours after RPV 150 single dose 24 1.21 (1.06, 1.39) 1.13 (1.01, 1.27) NA Ketoconazole 400 once daily 150 once daily 15 1.30 (1.13, 1.48) 1.49 (1.31, 1.70) 1.76 (1.57, 1.97) Methadone 60–100 once daily, individualized dose 25 once daily 12 ↔ ↔ ↔ Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir 90/400 once daily 25 once daily Study conducted with ODEFSEY (FTC/RPV/TAF). 42 0.97 (0.92, 1.02) 0.95 (0.91, 0.98) 0.93 (0.89, 0.97) Omeprazole 20 once daily 25 single dose 15 0.30 (0.24, 0.38) 0.35 (0.28, 0.44) NA Rifabutin 300 once daily 25 once daily 18 0.69 (0.62, 0.76) 0.58 (0.52, 0.65) 0.52 (0.46, 0.59) Rifampin 600 once daily 150 once daily 16 0.31 (0.27, 0.36) 0.20 (0.18, 0.23) 0.11 (0.10, 0.13) Simeprevir 25 once daily 150 once daily 23 1.04 (0.95, 1.30) 1.12 (1.05, 1.19) 1.25 (1.16, 1.35) Sildenafil 50 single dose 75 once daily 16 0.92 (0.85, 0.99) 0.98 (0.92, 1.05) 1.04 (0.98, 1.09) Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir 400/100 once daily 10 once daily Study conducted with FTC/RPV/TDF. 24 0.93 (0.88,0.98) 0.95 (0.90, 1.00) 0.96 (0.90,1.03) Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir 400/100/100 + 100 voxilaprevir Study conducted with additional voxilaprevir 100 mg to achieve voxilaprevir exposures expected in HCV-infected patients. once daily 25 once daily 30 0.79 (0.74, 0.84) 0.80 (0.76, 0.85) 0.82 (0.77, 0.87) Table 9 Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameters for TAF in the Presence of the Coadministered Drug All interaction studies conducted in healthy volunteers. in Healthy Subjects Coadministered Drug Dose of Coadministered Drug (mg) TAF (mg) N Mean Ratio of Tenofovir Alafenamide Pharmacokinetic Parameters (90% CI); No Effect = 1.00 C max AUC C min CI=Confidence Interval; N=maximum number of subjects with data; NA=Not Available Cobicistat Increases TAF exposure via inhibition of intestinal P-glycoprotein. 150 once daily 8 once daily 12 2.83 (2.20, 3.65) 2.65 (2.29, 3.07) NA Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir 90/400 once daily 25 once daily Study conducted with ODEFSEY (FTC/RPV/TAF). 42 1.03 (0.94, 1.14) 1.32 (1.25, 1.40) NA Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir 400/100/100 + 100 voxilaprevir Study conducted with additional voxilaprevir 100 mg to achieve voxilaprevir exposures expected in HCV-infected patients. once daily 25 once daily 30 1.32 (1.17, 1.48) 1.52 (1.43,1.61) NA Table 10 Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Coadministered Drugs in the Presence of RPV in Healthy Subjects Coadministered Drug Dose/Schedule Mean Ratio of Coadministered Drug Pharmacokinetic Parameters With/Without RPV (90% CI); No Effect = 1.00 Coadministered Drug (mg) RPV (mg) N C max AUC C min CI=Confidence Interval; N=maximum number of subjects with data; NA=Not Available Acetaminophen 500 single dose 150 once daily 25 mg, 75 mg, and 150 mg of RPV is 1, 3, and 6 times the recommended dose of RPV in ODEFSEY, respectively. 16 0.97 (0.86, 1.10) 0.92 (0.85, 0.99) NA Atorvastatin 40 once daily 150 once daily 16 1.35 (1.08, 1.68) 1.04 (0.97, 1.12) 0.85 (0.69, 1.03) 2-hydroxy-atorvastatin 1.58 (1.33, 1.87) 1.39 (1.29, 1.50) 1.32 (1.10, 1.58) 4-hydroxy-atorvastatin 1.28 (1.15, 1.43) 1.23 (1.13, 1.33) NA Chlorzoxazone 500 single dose taken 2 hours after RPV 150 once daily 16 0.98 (0.85, 1.13) 1.03 (0.95, 1.13) NA Digoxin 0.5 single dose 25 once daily Study conducted with RPV. 22 1.06 (0.97, 1.17) 0.98 (0.93, 1.04) AUC (0–last) . NA Ethinylestradiol 0.035 once daily 25 once daily 17 1.17 (1.06, 1.30) 1.14 (1.10, 1.19) 1.09 (1.03, 1.16) Norethindrone 1 mg once daily 0.94 (0.83, 1.06) 0.89 (0.84, 0.94) 0.99 (0.90, 1.08) Ketoconazole 400 once daily 150 once daily 14 0.85 (0.80, 0.90) 0.76 (0.70, 0.82) 0.34 (0.25, 0.46) Ledipasvir 90 once daily 25 once daily Study conducted with ODEFSEY (FTC/RPV/TAF). 41 1.01 (0.97, 1.05) 1.02 (0.97, 1.06) 1.02 (0.98, 1.07) Sofosbuvir 400 once daily 25 once daily 41 0.96 (0.89, 1.04) 1.05 (1.01, 1.09) NA GS-331007 The predominant circulating nucleoside metabolite of sofosbuvir. 1.08 (1.05, 1.11) 1.08 (1.06, 1.10) 1.10 (1.07, 1.12) R(-) methadone 60–100 once daily, individualized dose 25 once daily 13 0.86 (0.78, 0.95) 0.84 (0.74, 0.95) 0.78 (0.67, 0.91) S(+) methadone 0.87 (0.78, 0.97) 0.84 (0.74, 0.96) 0.79 (0.67, 0.92) Metformin 850 single dose 25 once daily 20 1.02 (0.95, 1.10) 0.97 (0.90,1.06) N (maximum number of subjects with data for AUC (0–∞) =15) NA Rifampin 600 once daily 150 once daily 16 1.02 (0.93, 1.12) 0.99 (0.92, 1.07) NA 25-desacetylrifampin 1.00 (0.87, 1.15) 0.91 (0.77, 1.07) NA Simeprevir 150 once daily 25 once daily 21 1.10 (0.97, 1.26) 1.06 (0.94, 1.19) 0.96 (0.83, 1.11) Sildenafil 50 single dose 75 once daily 16 0.93 (0.80, 1.08) 0.97 (0.87, 1.08) NA N -desmethyl-sildenafil 0.90 (0.80, 1.02) 0.92 (0.85, 0.99) NA Sofosbuvir GS-331007 400 once daily 25 once daily Study conducted with FTC/RPV/TDF. 24 1.09 (0.95, 1.25) 0.96 (0.90, 1.01) 1.16 (1.10, 1.24) 1.04 (1.00, 1.07) NA 1.12 (1.07, 1.17) Velpatasvir 100 once daily 25 once daily 24 0.96 (0.85, 1.10) 0.99 (0.88, 1.11) 1.02 (0.91, 1.15) Sofosbuvir 400 once daily 25 once daily 30 0.95 (0.86, 1.05) 1.01 (0.97, 1.06) NA GS-331007 1.02 (0.98, 1.06) 1.04 (1.01, 1.06) NA Velpatasvir 100 once daily 25 once daily 30 1.05 (0.96, 1.16) 1.01 (0.94, 1.07) 1.01 (0.95, 1.09) Voxilaprevir 100 + 100 once daily 25 once daily 30 0.96 (0.84, 1.11) 0.94 (0.84, 1.05) 1.02 (0.92, 1.12) Table 11 Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Coadministered Drug in the Presence of TAF in Healthy Subjects Coadministered Drug Dose of Coadministered Drug (mg) TAF (mg) N Mean Ratio of Coadministered Drug Pharmacokinetic Parameters (90% CI); No Effect = 1.00 C max AUC C min CI=Confidence Interval; N=maximum number of subjects with data; NA=Not Available Midazolam A sensitive CYP3A4 substrate. 2.5 single dose, orally 25 once daily Study conducted with TAF. 18 1.02 (0.92, 1.13) 1.13 (1.04, 1.23) NA 1 single dose, IV 0.99 (0.89, 1.11) 1.08 (1.04, 1.13) NA Ledipasvir Study conducted with ODEFSEY (FTC/RPV/TAF). 90/400 once daily 25 once daily 41 1.01 (0.97, 1.05) 1.02 (0.97, 1.06) 1.02 (0.98,1.07) Sofosbuvir 0.96 (0.89, 1.04) 1.05 (1.01, 1.09) NA GS-331007 , The predominant circulating nucleoside metabolite of sofosbuvir. 1.08 (1.05, 1.11) 1.08 (1.06, 1.10) 1.10 (1.07, 1.12) Norelgestromin norgestimate 0.180/0.215/0.250 once daily/ethinyl estradiol 0.025 once daily 25 once daily Study conducted with FTC/TAF. 29 1.17 (1.07,1.26) 1.12 (1.07, 1.17) 1.16 (1.08,1.24) Norgestrel 1.10 (1.02, 1.18) 1.09 (1.01, 1.18) 1.11 (1.03,1.20) Ethinyl estradiol 1.22 (1.15, 1.29) 1.11 (1.07, 1.16) 1.02 (0.93,1.12) Sofosbuvir 400 once daily 25 once daily 30 0.95 (0.86, 1.05) 1.01 (0.97, 1.06) NA GS-331007 1.02 (0.98, 1.06) 1.04 (1.01, 1.06) NA Velpatasvir 100 once daily 1.05 (0.96, 1.16) 1.01 (0.94, 1.07) 1.01 (0.95,1.09) Voxilaprevir 100 + 100 once daily 0.96 (0.84, 1.11) 0.94 (0.84, 1.05) 1.02 (0.92,1.12)

20230206

10

3 DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS Each ODEFSEY tablet contains 200 mg of emtricitabine (FTC), 25 mg of rilpivirine (RPV) (equivalent to 27.5 mg of rilpivirine hydrochloride), and 25 mg of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) (equivalent to 28 mg of tenofovir alafenamide fumarate). The tablets are gray, capsule-shaped, film-coated and debossed with "GSI" on one side and "255" on the other side. Tablets: 200 mg of FTC, 25 mg of RPV and 25 mg of TAF. ( 3 )

ODEFSEY emtricitabine, rilpivirine hydrochloride, and tenofovir alafenamide EMTRICITABINE EMTRICITABINE RILPIVIRINE HYDROCHLORIDE RILPIVIRINE TENOFOVIR ALAFENAMIDE FUMARATE TENOFOVIR ANHYDROUS TENOFOVIR ALAFENAMIDE LACTOSE MONOHYDRATE MICROCRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE POVIDONE, UNSPECIFIED POLYSORBATE 20 CROSCARMELLOSE SODIUM MAGNESIUM STEARATE WATER POLYVINYL ALCOHOL, UNSPECIFIED TITANIUM DIOXIDE POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL, UNSPECIFIED TALC FERROSOFERRIC OXIDE capsule-shaped GSI;255

13.2 Animal Toxicology and/or Pharmacology Minimal to slight infiltration of mononuclear cells in the posterior uvea was observed in dogs with similar severity after three- and nine-month administration of TAF; reversibility was seen after a three-month recovery period. No eye toxicity was observed in the dog at systemic exposures of 5 (TAF) and 15 (tenofovir) times the exposure seen in humans at the recommended daily TAF dose in ODEFSEY.

13.1 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility Emtricitabine: In long-term carcinogenicity studies of FTC, no drug-related increases in tumor incidence were found in mice at doses up to 750 mg per kg per day (23 times the human systemic exposure at the recommended dose of 200 mg per day in ODEFSEY) or in rats at doses up to 600 mg per kg per day (28 times the human systemic exposure at the recommended dose in ODEFSEY). FTC was not genotoxic in the reverse mutation bacterial test (Ames test), mouse lymphoma or mouse micronucleus assays. FTC did not affect fertility in male rats at approximately 140 times or in male and female mice at approximately 60 times higher exposures (AUC) than in humans given the recommended 200 mg daily dose in ODEFSEY. Fertility was normal in the offspring of mice exposed daily from before birth (in utero) through sexual maturity at daily exposures (AUC) of approximately 60 times higher than human exposures at the recommended 200 mg daily dose in ODEFSEY. Rilpivirine: RPV was evaluated for carcinogenic potential by oral gavage administration to mice and rats up to 104 weeks. Daily doses of 20, 60, and 160 mg per kg per day were administered to mice and doses of 40, 200, 500, and 1500 mg per kg per day were administered to rats. In rats, there were no drug-related neoplasms. In mice, RPV was positive for hepatocellular neoplasms in both males and females. The observed hepatocellular findings in mice may be rodent-specific. At the lowest tested doses in the carcinogenicity studies, the systemic exposures (based on AUC) to RPV were 21 times (mice) and 3 times (rats) relative to those observed in humans at the recommended dose (25 mg once daily) in ODEFSEY. RPV has tested negative in the absence and presence of a metabolic activation system, in the in vitro Ames reverse mutation assay and in vitro clastogenicity mouse lymphoma assay. RPV did not induce chromosomal damage in the in vivo micronucleus test in mice . In a study conducted in rats, there were no effects on mating or fertility with RPV up to 400 mg per kg per day, a dose of RPV that showed maternal toxicity. This dose is associated with an exposure that is approximately 40 times higher than the exposure in humans at the recommended dose of 25 mg once daily in ODEFSEY. Tenofovir Alafenamide: Since TAF is rapidly converted to tenofovir and a lower tenofovir exposure in rats and mice was observed after TAF administration compared to TDF administration, carcinogenicity studies were conducted only with TDF. Long-term oral carcinogenicity studies of TDF in mice and rats were carried out at exposures up to approximately 10 times (mice) and 4 times (rats) those observed in humans at the recommended dose of TDF (300 mg) for HIV-1 infection. The tenofovir exposure in these studies was approximately 167 times (mice) and 55 times (rat) those observed in humans after administration of the daily recommended dose of ODEFSEY. At the high dose in female mice, liver adenomas were increased at tenofovir exposures approximately 10 times (300 mg TDF) and 167 times (ODEFSEY) the exposure observed in humans. In rats, the study was negative for carcinogenic findings. TAF was not genotoxic in the reverse mutation bacterial test (Ames test), mouse lymphoma or rat micronucleus assays. There were no effects on fertility, mating performance or early embryonic development when TAF was administered to male rats at a dose equivalent to 62 times the human dose based on body surface area comparisons for 28 days prior to mating and to female rats for 14 days prior to mating through Day 7 of gestation.

13 NONCLINICAL TOXICOLOGY 13.1 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility Emtricitabine: In long-term carcinogenicity studies of FTC, no drug-related increases in tumor incidence were found in mice at doses up to 750 mg per kg per day (23 times the human systemic exposure at the recommended dose of 200 mg per day in ODEFSEY) or in rats at doses up to 600 mg per kg per day (28 times the human systemic exposure at the recommended dose in ODEFSEY). FTC was not genotoxic in the reverse mutation bacterial test (Ames test), mouse lymphoma or mouse micronucleus assays. FTC did not affect fertility in male rats at approximately 140 times or in male and female mice at approximately 60 times higher exposures (AUC) than in humans given the recommended 200 mg daily dose in ODEFSEY. Fertility was normal in the offspring of mice exposed daily from before birth (in utero) through sexual maturity at daily exposures (AUC) of approximately 60 times higher than human exposures at the recommended 200 mg daily dose in ODEFSEY. Rilpivirine: RPV was evaluated for carcinogenic potential by oral gavage administration to mice and rats up to 104 weeks. Daily doses of 20, 60, and 160 mg per kg per day were administered to mice and doses of 40, 200, 500, and 1500 mg per kg per day were administered to rats. In rats, there were no drug-related neoplasms. In mice, RPV was positive for hepatocellular neoplasms in both males and females. The observed hepatocellular findings in mice may be rodent-specific. At the lowest tested doses in the carcinogenicity studies, the systemic exposures (based on AUC) to RPV were 21 times (mice) and 3 times (rats) relative to those observed in humans at the recommended dose (25 mg once daily) in ODEFSEY. RPV has tested negative in the absence and presence of a metabolic activation system, in the in vitro Ames reverse mutation assay and in vitro clastogenicity mouse lymphoma assay. RPV did not induce chromosomal damage in the in vivo micronucleus test in mice . In a study conducted in rats, there were no effects on mating or fertility with RPV up to 400 mg per kg per day, a dose of RPV that showed maternal toxicity. This dose is associated with an exposure that is approximately 40 times higher than the exposure in humans at the recommended dose of 25 mg once daily in ODEFSEY. Tenofovir Alafenamide: Since TAF is rapidly converted to tenofovir and a lower tenofovir exposure in rats and mice was observed after TAF administration compared to TDF administration, carcinogenicity studies were conducted only with TDF. Long-term oral carcinogenicity studies of TDF in mice and rats were carried out at exposures up to approximately 10 times (mice) and 4 times (rats) those observed in humans at the recommended dose of TDF (300 mg) for HIV-1 infection. The tenofovir exposure in these studies was approximately 167 times (mice) and 55 times (rat) those observed in humans after administration of the daily recommended dose of ODEFSEY. At the high dose in female mice, liver adenomas were increased at tenofovir exposures approximately 10 times (300 mg TDF) and 167 times (ODEFSEY) the exposure observed in humans. In rats, the study was negative for carcinogenic findings. TAF was not genotoxic in the reverse mutation bacterial test (Ames test), mouse lymphoma or rat micronucleus assays. There were no effects on fertility, mating performance or early embryonic development when TAF was administered to male rats at a dose equivalent to 62 times the human dose based on body surface area comparisons for 28 days prior to mating and to female rats for 14 days prior to mating through Day 7 of gestation. 13.2 Animal Toxicology and/or Pharmacology Minimal to slight infiltration of mononuclear cells in the posterior uvea was observed in dogs with similar severity after three- and nine-month administration of TAF; reversibility was seen after a three-month recovery period. No eye toxicity was observed in the dog at systemic exposures of 5 (TAF) and 15 (tenofovir) times the exposure seen in humans at the recommended daily TAF dose in ODEFSEY.

NDA208351

ODEFSEY

emtricitabine, rilpivirine hydrochloride, and tenofovir alafenamide

61958-2101

HUMAN PRESCRIPTION DRUG

ORAL

12.4 Microbiology Mechanism of Action Emtricitabine: FTC, a synthetic nucleoside analog of cytidine, is phosphorylated by cellular enzymes to form emtricitabine 5'-triphosphate. Emtricitabine 5'-triphosphate inhibits the activity of the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) by competing with the natural substrate deoxycytidine 5'-triphosphate and by being incorporated into nascent viral DNA which results in chain termination. Emtricitabine 5′-triphosphate is a weak inhibitor of mammalian DNA polymerases α, β, Ɛ, and mitochondrial DNA polymerase γ. Rilpivirine: RPV is a diarylpyrimidine non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor of HIV-1 and inhibits HIV-1 replication by non-competitive inhibition of HIV-1 RT. RPV does not inhibit the human cellular DNA polymerases α, β, and mitochondrial DNA polymerase γ. Tenofovir Alafenamide: TAF is a phosphonamidate prodrug of tenofovir (2'-deoxyadenosine monophosphate analog). Plasma exposure to TAF allows for permeation into cells and then TAF is intracellularly converted to tenofovir through hydrolysis by cathepsin A. Tenofovir is subsequently phosphorylated by cellular kinases to the active metabolite tenofovir diphosphate. Tenofovir diphosphate inhibits HIV-1 replication through incorporation into viral DNA by the HIV reverse transcriptase, which results in DNA chain termination. Tenofovir has activity against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1). Cell culture studies have shown that both tenofovir and FTC can be fully phosphorylated when combined in cells. Tenofovir diphosphate is a weak inhibitor of mammalian DNA polymerases that include mitochondrial DNA polymerase γ and there is no evidence of toxicity to mitochondria cell culture. Antiviral Activity in Cell Culture Emtricitabine, Rilpivirine, and Tenofovir Alafenamide: The combinations of FTC, RPV, and TAF were not antagonistic with each other in cell culture combination antiviral activity assays. In addition, FTC, RPV, and TAF were not antagonistic with a panel of representatives from the major classes of approved anti-HIV agents (NNRTIs, NRTIs, INSTIs, and PIs). Emtricitabine: The antiviral activity of FTC against laboratory and clinical isolates of HIV-1 was assessed in T lymphoblastoid cell lines, the MAGI-CCR5 cell line, and primary peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). The EC 50 values for FTC were in the range of 0.0013–0.64 microM. FTC displayed antiviral activity in cell culture against HIV-1 clades A, B, C, D, E, F, and G (EC 50 values ranged from 0.007–0.075 microM) and showed strain-specific activity against HIV-2 (EC 50 values ranged from 0.007–1.5 microM). Rilpivirine: RPV exhibited activity against laboratory strains of wild-type HIV-1 in an acutely infected T-cell line with a median EC 50 value for HIV-1 IIIB of 0.73 nM. RPV demonstrated limited activity in cell culture against HIV-2 with a median EC 50 value of 5220 nM (range 2510–10,830 nM). RPV demonstrated antiviral activity against a broad panel of HIV-1 group M (subtype A, B, C, D, F, G, H) primary isolates with EC 50 values ranging from 0.07–1.01 nM and was less active against group O primary isolates with EC 50 values ranging from 2.88–8.45 nM. Tenofovir Alafenamide: The antiviral activity of TAF against laboratory and clinical isolates of HIV-1 subtype B was assessed in lymphoblastoid cell lines, PBMCs, primary monocyte/macrophage cells and CD4-T lymphocytes. The EC 50 values for TAF ranged from 2.0–14.7 nM. TAF displayed antiviral activity in cell culture against all HIV-1 groups (M, N, O), including sub-types A, B, C, D, E, F, and G (EC 50 values ranged from 0.10–12.0 nM) and strain specific activity against HIV-2 (EC 50 values ranged from 0.91–2.63 nM). Resistance In Cell Culture Emtricitabine: HIV-1 isolates with reduced susceptibility to FTC were selected in cell culture. Reduced susceptibility to FTC was associated with M184V or I substitutions in HIV-1 RT. Rilpivirine: RPV-resistant strains were selected in cell culture starting from wild-type HIV-1 of different origins and subtypes as well as NNRTI-resistant HIV-1. The frequently observed amino acid substitutions that emerged and conferred decreased phenotypic susceptibility to RPV included: L100I, K101E, V106I and A, V108I, E138K and G, Q, R, V179F and I, Y181C and I, V189I, G190E, H221Y, F227C, and M230I and L. Tenofovir Alafenamide: HIV-1 isolates with reduced susceptibility to TAF were selected in cell culture. HIV-1 isolates selected by TAF expressed a K65R substitution in HIV-1 RT, sometimes in the presence of S68N or L429I substitutions; in addition, a K70E substitution in HIV-1 RT was observed. In Clinical Trials In HIV-1-Infected Subjects With No Antiretroviral Treatment History Emtricitabine and Tenofovir Alafenamide: The resistance profile of ODEFSEY for the treatment of HIV-1 infection is based on studies of FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI in the treatment of HIV-1 infection . In a pooled analysis of antiretroviral-naïve subjects, genotyping was performed on plasma HIV-1 isolates from all subjects with HIV-1 RNA greater than 400 copies per mL at confirmed virologic failure, at Week 48, or at time of early study drug discontinuation. Genotypic resistance developed in 7 of 14 evaluable subjects. The resistance–associated substitutions that emerged were M184V/I (N=7) and K65R (N=1). Three subjects had virus with emergent R, H, or E at the polymorphic Q207 residue in reverse transcriptase. Rilpivirine: In the Week 96 pooled resistance analysis for adult subjects receiving RPV or efavirenz in combination with FTC/TDF, the emergence of resistance was greater among subjects' viruses in the RPV+FTC/TDF arm compared to the efavirenz+FTC/TDF arm and was dependent on baseline viral load. In the Week 96 resistance analysis, 14% (77/550) of the subjects in the RPV+FTC/TDF arm and 8% (43/546) of the subjects in the efavirenz+FTC/TDF arm qualified for resistance analysis; 61% (47/77) of the subjects who qualified for resistance analysis (resistance-analysis subjects) in the RPV+FTC/TDF arm had virus with genotypic and/or phenotypic resistance to RPV compared to 42% (18/43) of the resistance-analysis subjects in the efavirenz+FTC/TDF arm who had genotypic and/or phenotypic resistance to efavirenz. Moreover, genotypic and/or phenotypic resistance to emtricitabine or tenofovir emerged in viruses from 57% (44/77) of the resistance-analysis subjects in the RPV arm compared to 26% (11/43) in the efavirenz arm. Emerging NNRTI substitutions in the RPV resistance analysis of subjects' viruses included V90I, K101E/P/T, E138K/A/Q/G, V179I/L, Y181C/I, V189I, H221Y, F227C/L, and M230L, which were associated with an RPV phenotypic fold change range of 2.6–621. The E138K substitution emerged most frequently during RPV treatment, commonly in combination with the M184I substitution. The emtricitabine and lamivudine resistance-associated substitutions M184I or V and NRTI resistance-associated substitutions (K65R/N, A62V, D67N/G, K70E, Y115F, K219E/R) emerged more frequently in the RPV resistance-analysis subjects than in efavirenz resistance-analysis subjects . NNRTI- and NRTI-resistance substitutions emerged less frequently in the resistance analysis of viruses from subjects with baseline viral loads of less than or equal to 100,000 copies/mL compared to viruses from subjects with baseline viral loads of greater than 100,000 copies/mL: 23% (10/44) compared to 77% (34/44) of NNRTI-resistance substitutions and 20% (9/44) compared to 80% (35/44) of NRTI-resistance substitutions. This difference was also observed for the individual emtricitabine/lamivudine and tenofovir resistance substitutions: 22% (9/41) compared to 78% (32/41) for M184I/V and 0% (0/8) compared to 100% (8/8) for K65R/N. Additionally, NNRTI and/or NRTI-resistance substitutions emerged less frequently in the resistance analysis of the viruses from subjects with baseline CD4+ cell counts greater than or equal to 200 cells/mm 3 compared to the viruses from subjects with baseline CD4+ cell counts less than 200 cells/mm 3 : 32% (14/44) compared to 68% (30/44) of NNRTI-resistance substitutions and 27% (12/44) compared to 73% (32/44) of NRTI-resistance substitutions. In Virologically-Suppressed Subjects Emtricitabine and Tenofovir Alafenamide: One subject was identified with emergent resistance to FTC or TAF (M184M/I) out of 4 virologic failure subjects in a clinical study of virologically-suppressed subjects who switched from a regimen containing FTC+TDF to FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI (N=799). Rilpivirine: Through Week 48, 4 subjects who switched their protease inhibitor-based regimen to FTC/RPV/TDF (4 of 469 subjects, 0.9%) and 1 subject who maintained their regimen (1 of 159 subjects, 0.6%) developed genotypic and/or phenotypic resistance to a study drug. All 4 of the subjects who had resistance emergence on FTC/RPV/TDF had evidence of FTC resistance and 3 of the subjects had evidence of RPV resistance. ODEFSEY: Through Week 48, in subjects who switched to ODEFSEY from FTC/RPV/TDF or EFV/FTC/TDF (Trials 1216 (N=316) and 1160 (N=438), respectively), of seven subjects who developed virologic failure, three subjects had detectable NNRTI and/or NRTI resistance substitutions at virologic failure that were pre-existing in the baseline sample by proviral DNA sequencing; one of these subjects resuppressed while maintaining ODEFSEY. Cross-Resistance Emtricitabine: FTC-resistant viruses with the M184V/I substitution were cross-resistant to lamivudine, but retained sensitivity to didanosine, stavudine, tenofovir, and zidovudine. Viruses harboring substitutions conferring reduced susceptibility to stavudine and zidovudine—thymidine analog substitutions (M41L, D67N, K70R, L210W, T215Y/F, K219Q/E), or didanosine (L74V) remained sensitive to FTC. HIV-1 containing the K103N substitution or other substitutions associated with resistance to NNRTIs was susceptible to FTC. Rilpivirine: Considering all of the available cell culture and clinical data, any of the following amino acid substitutions, when present at baseline, are likely to decrease the antiviral activity of RPV: K101E, K101P, E138A, E138G, E138K, E138R, E138Q, V179L, Y181C, Y181I, Y181V, Y188L, H221Y, F227C, M230I, M230L, and the combination of L100I+K103N. Cross-resistance in site-directed mutant virus has been observed among NNRTIs. The single NNRTI substitutions K101P, Y181I, and Y181V conferred 52 times, 15 times, and 12 times decreased susceptibility to RPV, respectively. The combination of E138K and M184I showed 6.7 times reduced susceptibility to RPV compared to 2.8 times for E138K alone. The K103N substitution did not show reduced susceptibility to RPV by itself. However, the combination of K103N and L100I resulted in a 7 times reduced susceptibility to RPV. In another study, the Y188L substitution resulted in a reduced susceptibility to RPV of 9 times for clinical isolates and 6 times for site-directed mutants. Combinations of 2 or 3 NNRTI resistance-associated substitutions gave decreased susceptibility to RPV (fold change range of 3.7–554) in 38% and 66% of mutants, respectively. Cross-resistance to efavirenz, etravirine, and/or nevirapine is likely after virologic failure and development of RPV resistance. Tenofovir Alafenamide: Tenofovir resistance substitutions K65R and K70E result in reduced susceptibility to abacavir, didanosine, emtricitabine, lamivudine, and tenofovir. HIV-1 with multiple thymidine analog substitutions (M41L, D67N, K70R, L210W, T215F/Y, K219Q/E/N/R), or multinucleoside resistant HIV-1 with a T69S double insertion mutation or with a Q151M substitution complex including K65R showed reduced susceptibility to TAF in cell culture.

PRINCIPAL DISPLAY PANEL - 30 Tablet Bottle Label NDC 61958- 2101 -1 30 tablets Odefsey ® (emtricitabine, rilpivirine, and tenofovir alafenamide) Tablets 200 mg/25 mg/25 mg Note to pharmacist: Do not cover ALERT box with pharmacy label. ALERT: Find out about medicines that should NOT be taken with Odefsey ® odefsey-04.jpg

Warnings and Precautions, New Onset or Worsening Renal Impairment ( 5.5 ) 03/2021

ODEFSEY is a trademark of Gilead Sciences, Inc., or its related companies. All other trademarks referenced herein are the property of their respective owners.

17 PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION Advise the patient to read the FDA-approved patient labeling (Patient Information). Post-treatment Acute Exacerbation of Hepatitis B in Patients with HBV Coinfection Severe acute exacerbations of hepatitis B have been reported in patients who are coinfected with HBV and HIV-1 and have discontinued products containing FTC and/or TDF, and may likewise occur with discontinuation of ODEFSEY [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) ] . Advise the patient to not discontinue ODEFSEY without first informing their healthcare provider. Severe Skin Reactions and Hypersensitivity Inform patients that skin reactions ranging from mild to severe, including Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS), have been reported with RPV-containing products. Instruct patients to immediately stop taking ODEFSEY and seek medical attention if they develop a rash associated with any of the following symptoms: fever, blisters, mucosal involvement, eye inflammation (conjunctivitis), severe allergic reaction causing swelling of the face, eyes, lips, mouth, tongue or throat which may lead to difficulty swallowing or breathing, and any signs and symptoms of liver problems, as they may be a sign of a more serious reaction. Patients should understand that if severe rash occurs, they will be closely monitored, laboratory tests will be performed and appropriate therapy will be initiated [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2) ]. Hepatotoxicity Inform patients that hepatotoxicity has been reported with RPV, therefore, it is important to inform the healthcare professional if patients have underlying hepatitis B or C or elevations in liver-associated tests prior to treatment [see Dosage and Administration (2.1) and Warnings and Precautions (5.3) ] . Depressive Disorders Inform patients that depressive disorders (depressed mood, depression, dysphoria, major depression, mood altered, negative thoughts, suicide attempt, suicidal ideation) have been reported with RPV. Inform patients to seek immediate medical evaluation if they experience depressive symptoms [see Warnings and Precautions (5.4) ]. New Onset or Worsening Renal Impairment Advise patients to avoid taking ODEFSEY with concurrent or recent use of nephrotoxic agents. Postmarketing cases of renal impairment, including acute renal failure, have been reported [see Warnings and Precautions (5.5) ]. Drug Interactions ODEFSEY may interact with many drugs and is not recommended to be coadministered with numerous drugs. Advise patients to report to their healthcare provider the use of any other prescription or nonprescription medication or herbal products, including St. John's wort [see Contraindications (4) , Warnings and Precautions (5.6) and Drug Interactions (7) ] . Lactic Acidosis and Severe Hepatomegaly Lactic acidosis and severe hepatomegaly with steatosis, including fatal cases, have been reported with use of drugs similar to ODEFSEY. Advise patients to stop taking ODEFSEY if they develop clinical symptoms suggestive of lactic acidosis or pronounced hepatotoxicity [see Warnings and Precautions (5.7) ] . Immune Reconstitution Syndrome Advise patients to inform their healthcare provider immediately of any symptoms of infection, as in some patients with advanced HIV infection (AIDS), signs and symptoms of inflammation from previous infections may occur soon after anti-HIV treatment is started [see Warnings and Precautions (5.8) ]. Missed Dosage Inform patients that it is important to take ODEFSEY on a regular dosing schedule with a meal and to avoid missing doses, as it can result in development of resistance [see Dosage and Administration (2.2) ] . Pregnancy Registry Inform patients that there is an antiretroviral pregnancy registry to monitor fetal outcomes in those exposed to ODEFSEY during pregnancy [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1) ]. Lactation Instruct patients with HIV-1 infection not to breastfeed because HIV-1 can be passed to the baby in breast milk [see Use in Specific Populations (8.2) ].

14 CLINICAL STUDIES 14.1 Clinical Trial Results in HIV-1 Virologically-Suppressed Subjects Who Switched to ODEFSEY In Trial 1216, the efficacy and safety of switching from emtricitabine/rilpivirine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/RPV/TDF) to ODEFSEY were evaluated in a randomized, double-blind study of virologically-suppressed HIV-1 infected adults. Subjects were suppressed (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL) on their baseline regimen of FTC/RPV/TDF for at least 6 months and have no documented resistance mutations to FTC, TAF, or RPV prior to study entry. Subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either switch to ODEFSEY (N=316) once daily or stay on FTC/RPV/TDF (N=314) once daily. Subjects had a mean age of 45 years (range: 23–72), 90% were male, 75% were White, and 19% were Black. The mean baseline CD4+ cell count was 709 cells/mm 3 (range: 104–2527). In Trial 1160, the efficacy and safety of switching from efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (EFV/FTC/TDF) to ODEFSEY were evaluated in a randomized, double-blind study of virologically-suppressed HIV-1 infected adults. Subjects must have been stably suppressed (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL) on their baseline regimen of EFV/FTC/TDF for at least 6 months and have no documented resistance mutations to FTC, TAF, or RPV prior to study entry. Subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either switch to ODEFSEY (N=438) once daily or stay on EFV/FTC/TDF (N=437) once daily. Subjects had a mean age of 48 years (range: 19−76), 87% were male, 67% were White, and 27% were Black. The mean baseline CD4+ cell count was 700 cells/mm 3 (range: 140–1862). Treatment outcomes of Trials 1216 and 1160 are presented in Table 12. Table 12 Virologic Outcomes of Trials 1216 and 1160 at Week 48 Week 48 window was between Day 295 and 378 (inclusive). in Virologically-Suppressed Subjects who Switched to ODEFSEY Study 1216 Study 1160 ODEFSEY (N=316) FTC/RPV/TDF (N=313) One subject who was not on FTC/RPV/TDF prior to screening was excluded from the efficacy analysis. ODEFSEY (N=438) EFV/FTC/TDF (N=437) HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL 94% 94% 90% 92% HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL Included subjects who had HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL in the Week 48 window; subjects who discontinued early due to lack or loss of efficacy; subjects who discontinued for reasons other than lack or loss of efficacy and at the time of discontinuation had a viral value of ≥50 copies/mL. 1% 0% 1% 1% No Virologic Data at Week 48 Window 6% 6% 9% 7% Discontinued Study Drug Due to AE or Death and Last Available HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL 2% 1% 3% 1% Discontinued Study Drug Due to Other Reasons and Last Available HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL Includes subjects who discontinued for reasons other than an AE, death, or lack or loss of efficacy; e.g., withdrew consent, loss to follow-up, etc. 4% 4% 5% 5% Missing Data During Window but on Study Drug <1% 1% 1% 1% 14.2 Clinical Trial Results for Adult Subjects with no Antiretroviral Treatment History and Adults with Renal Impairment for Components of ODEFSEY The efficacy of RPV, FTC, and TAF in the treatment of HIV-1 infection in adults as initial therapy in those with no antiretroviral treatment history [see Indications and Usage (1) ] was established in trials of: RPV+FTC/TDF in HIV-1 infected adults as initial therapy in those with no antiretroviral treatment history (n=550). The virologic response rate (i.e., HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL) was 77% at Week 96. The virologic response rate at 96 weeks was 83% in subjects with baseline HIV-1 RNA less than or equal to 100,000 copies per mL and 71% in subjects with baseline HIV-1 RNA greater than 100,000 copies per mL. Further, the virologic response rate at 96 weeks among subjects with baseline CD4+ cell counts less than 200 and greater than or equal to 200 cells/mm 3 were 68% and 82%, respectively. FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI in HIV-1 infected adults as initial therapy in those with no antiretroviral treatment history (n=866). The virologic response rate (i.e., HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL) was 92% at Week 48. In the clinical trial of 248 HIV-1 infected adults with estimated creatinine clearance greater than 30 mL per minute but less than 70 mL per minute, 95% (235/248) of the combined populations of treatment-naïve (N=6) begun on FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI and those previously virologically-suppressed on other regimens (N=242) and switched to FTC+TAF with EVG +COBI had HIV-1 RNA levels less than 50 copies per mL at Week 24. 14.3 Clinical Trial Results for Pediatric Subjects Aged 12 to Less than 18 Years Old with no Antiretroviral Treatment History for Components of ODEFSEY The efficacy of RPV, FTC, and TAF in the treatment of HIV-1 infection in pediatric patients aged 12 to less than 18 years old and greater than 32–35 kg as initial therapy in those with no antiretroviral treatment history and to replace a stable antiretroviral regimen in those who are virologically-suppressed [see Indications and Usage (1) ] was established in trials of antiretroviral treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected pediatric subjects 12 to less than 18 years old with: RPV in combination with other antiretroviral agents in 36 treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected adolescents weighing at least 32 kg. The majority of subjects (24/36) received RPV in combination with FTC and TDF. Of these 24 subjects, 20 had a baseline HIV-1 RNA less than or equal to 100,000 copies per mL. The virologic response rate in these 20 subjects (i.e., HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL) was 80% (16/20) at 48 weeks. FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI in 23 adolescents weighing at least 35 kg. The virologic response rate (i.e., HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL) was 91% at 24 weeks.

8.5 Geriatric Use In clinical trials, 80 of the 97 subjects enrolled aged 65 years and over received FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI. No differences in safety or efficacy have been observed between elderly subjects and those between 12 and less than 65 years of age. Clinical trials of RPV did not include sufficient numbers of subjects aged 65 years and over to determine whether they respond differently from younger subjects [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ].

8.4 Pediatric Use The efficacy and safety of ODEFSEY as a complete regimen for the treatment of HIV-1 infection was established in pediatric patients 12 years of age and older with body weight greater than or equal to 35 kg [see Dosage and Administration (2.2) ]. Use of ODEFSEY in this age group is supported by adequate and well-controlled studies of RPV+FTC+TDF in adults with HIV-1 infection, adequate and well-controlled studies of FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI in adults with HIV-1 infection, and by the following pediatric studies [see Clinical Studies (14) ]: 48-week open-label trial of 36 antiretroviral treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected pediatric subjects 12 to less than 18 years old weighing at least 32 kg treated with 25 mg per day of RPV and other antiretrovirals. The safety and efficacy of RPV administered with other antiretrovirals were similar to that of antiretroviral treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected adults on this regimen [see Adverse Reactions (6.1) and Clinical Studies (14) ]. 24-week open-label trial of 23 antiretroviral treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected pediatric subjects 12 to less than 18 years old (weighing at least 35 kg) treated with FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI. The safety and efficacy of FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI were similar to that of antiretroviral treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected adults on this regimen [see Adverse Reactions (6.1) and Clinical Studies (14) ]. Because it is a fixed-dose combination tablet, the dose of ODEFSEY cannot be adjusted for patients of lower age and weight. The safety and efficacy of ODEFSEY have not been established in pediatric patients weighing less than 35 kg [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ] .

8.1 Pregnancy Pregnancy Exposure Registry There is a pregnancy exposure registry that monitors pregnancy outcomes in individuals exposed to ODEFSEY during pregnancy. Healthcare providers are encouraged to register patients by calling the Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry (APR) at 1-800-258-4263. Risk Summary Available data from the APR show no statistically significant difference in the overall risk of major birth defects for emtricitabine (FTC), rilpivirine (RPV) or tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) compared with the background rate for major birth defects of 2.7% in a US reference population of the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program (MACDP) (see Data ) . The rate of miscarriage is not reported in the APR. The estimated background rate of miscarriage in the clinically recognized pregnancies in the U.S. general population is 15–20%. Based on the experience of HIV-1-infected pregnant individuals who completed a clinical trial through the postpartum period with an RPV-based regimen, no dose adjustments are required for pregnant patients who are already on a stable RPV-containing regimen prior to pregnancy and who are virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL). Lower exposures of RPV were observed during pregnancy compared to the postpartum period. Therefore, viral load should be monitored closely [see Data and Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ] . In animal studies, no adverse developmental effects were observed when the components of ODEFSEY were administered separately during the period of organogenesis at exposures up to 60 and 108 times (mice and rabbits, respectively; FTC), 15 and 70 times (rats and rabbits, respectively; RPV) and equal to and 53 times (rats and rabbits, respectively; TAF) the exposure at the recommended daily dose of these components in ODEFSEY (see Data ) . Likewise, no adverse developmental effects were seen when FTC was administered to mice and RPV was administered to rats through lactation at exposures up to approximately 60 and 63 times, respectively, the exposure at the recommended daily dose of these components in ODEFSEY. No adverse effects were observed in the offspring when TDF was administered through lactation at tenofovir exposures of approximately 14 times the exposure at the recommended daily dosage of ODEFSEY. Data Human Data Prospective reports from the APR of overall major birth defects in pregnancies exposed to drug components of ODEFSEY are compared with a U.S. background major birth defect rate. Methodological limitations of the APR include the use of MACDP as the external comparator group. The MACDP population is not disease-specific, evaluates women and infants from a limited geographic area, and does not include outcomes for births that occurred at less than 20 weeks gestation. Emtricitabine (FTC): Based on prospective reports to the APR of over 5,400 exposures to FTC-containing regimens during pregnancy resulting in live births (including over 3,900 exposed in the first trimester and over 1,500 exposed in the second/third trimester), the prevalence of birth defects in live births was 2.6% (95% CI: 2.2% to 3.2%) and 2.7% (95% CI: 1.9% to 3.7%) following first and second/third trimester exposure, respectively, to FTC-containing regimens. Rilpivirine (RPV): RPV in combination with a background regimen was evaluated in a clinical trial of 19 HIV-1 infected pregnant subjects during the second and third trimesters and postpartum. Each of the subjects were on an RPV-based regimen at the time of enrollment. Twelve subjects completed the trial through the postpartum period (6–12 weeks after delivery) and pregnancy outcomes are missing for six subjects. The exposure (C 0h and AUC) of total RPV was approximately 30 to 40% lower during pregnancy compared with postpartum (6 to 12 weeks). The protein binding of RPV was similar (>99%) during second trimester, third trimester, and postpartum period [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ] . One subject discontinued the trial following fetal death at 25 weeks gestation due to suspected premature rupture of membranes. Among the 12 subjects who were virologically suppressed at baseline (less than 50 copies/mL), virologic response was preserved in 10 subjects (83.3%) through the third trimester visit and in 9 subjects (75%) through the 6–12 week postpartum visit. Virologic outcomes during the third trimester visit were missing for two subjects who were withdrawn (one subject was nonadherent to the study drug and one subject withdrew consent). Among the 10 infants with HIV test results available, born to 10 HIV-infected pregnant subjects, all had test results that were negative for HIV-1 at the time of delivery and up to 16 weeks postpartum. All 10 infants received antiretroviral prophylactic treatment with zidovudine. RPV was well tolerated during pregnancy and postpartum. There were no new safety findings compared with the known safety profile of RPV in HIV–1-infected adults. Based on prospective reports to the APR of over 750 exposures to RPV-containing regimens during pregnancy resulting in live births (including over 550 exposed in the first trimester and over 200 exposed in the second/third trimester), the prevalence of birth defects in live births was 1.4% (95% CI: 0.6% to 2.8%) and 1.5% (95% CI: 0.3% to 4.3%) following first and second/third trimester exposure, respectively, to RPV-containing regimens. Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF): Based on prospective reports to the APR of over 660 exposures to TAF-containing regimens during pregnancy resulting in live births (including over 520 exposed in the first trimester and over 130 exposed in the second/third trimester), the prevalence of birth defects in live births was 4.2% (95% CI: 2.6% to 6.3%) and 3.0% (95% CI: 0.8% to 7.5%) following first and second/third trimester exposure, respectively, to TAF-containing regimens. Animal Data Emtricitabine: FTC was administered orally to pregnant mice (250, 500, or 1000 mg/kg/day) and rabbits (100, 300, or 1000 mg/kg/day) through organogenesis (on gestation days 6 through 15, and 7 through 19, respectively). No significant toxicological effects were observed in embryo-fetal toxicity studies performed with FTC in mice at exposures (AUC) approximately 60 times higher and in rabbits at approximately 108 times higher than human exposures at the recommended daily dose. In a pre/postnatal development study with FTC, mice were administered doses up to 1000 mg/kg/day; no significant adverse effects directly related to drug were observed in the offspring exposed daily from before birth ( in utero ) through sexual maturity at daily exposures (AUC) of approximately 60-fold higher than human exposures at the recommended daily dose. Rilpivirine: RPV was administered orally to pregnant rats (40, 120, or 400 mg/kg/day) and rabbits (5, 10, or 20 mg/kg/day) through organogenesis (on gestation days 6 through 17, and 6 through 19, respectively). No significant toxicological effects were observed in embryo-fetal toxicity studies performed with RPV in rats and rabbits at exposures 15 (rats) and 70 (rabbits) times higher than the exposure in humans at the recommended dose of 25 mg once daily. In a pre/postnatal development study with RPV, where rats were administered up to 400 mg/kg/day through lactation, no significant adverse effects directly related to drug were noted in the offspring. Tenofovir Alafenamide: TAF was administered orally to pregnant rats (25, 100, or 250 mg/kg/day) and rabbits (10, 30, or 100 mg/kg/day) through organogenesis (on gestation days 6 through 17, and 7 through 20, respectively). No adverse embryo-fetal effects were observed in rats and rabbits at TAF exposures similar to (rats) and approximately 53 (rabbits) times higher than the exposure in humans at the recommended daily dose of ODEFSEY. TAF is rapidly converted to tenofovir; the observed tenofovir exposure in rats and rabbits were 59 (rats) and 93 (rabbits) times higher than human tenofovir exposures at the recommended daily doses. Since TAF is rapidly converted to tenofovir and a lower tenofovir exposure in rats and mice was observed after TAF administration compared to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF, another prodrug for tenofovir) administration, a pre/postnatal development study in rats was conducted only with TDF. Doses up to 600 mg/kg/day were administered through lactation, no adverse effects were observed in the offspring on gestation day 7 [and lactation day 20] at tenofovir exposures of approximately 14 [21] times higher than the exposures in humans at the recommended daily dose of ODEFSEY.

8 USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS Pregnancy: Total rilpivirine exposures were generally lower during pregnancy compared to the postpartum period. ( 2.3 , 8.1 , 12.3 ). Lactation: Breastfeeding not recommended due to the potential for HIV-1 transmission. ( 8.2 ) Pediatrics: Not recommended for patients weighing less than 35 kg. ( 8.4 ) 8.1 Pregnancy Pregnancy Exposure Registry There is a pregnancy exposure registry that monitors pregnancy outcomes in individuals exposed to ODEFSEY during pregnancy. Healthcare providers are encouraged to register patients by calling the Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry (APR) at 1-800-258-4263. Risk Summary Available data from the APR show no statistically significant difference in the overall risk of major birth defects for emtricitabine (FTC), rilpivirine (RPV) or tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) compared with the background rate for major birth defects of 2.7% in a US reference population of the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program (MACDP) (see Data ) . The rate of miscarriage is not reported in the APR. The estimated background rate of miscarriage in the clinically recognized pregnancies in the U.S. general population is 15–20%. Based on the experience of HIV-1-infected pregnant individuals who completed a clinical trial through the postpartum period with an RPV-based regimen, no dose adjustments are required for pregnant patients who are already on a stable RPV-containing regimen prior to pregnancy and who are virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL). Lower exposures of RPV were observed during pregnancy compared to the postpartum period. Therefore, viral load should be monitored closely [see Data and Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ] . In animal studies, no adverse developmental effects were observed when the components of ODEFSEY were administered separately during the period of organogenesis at exposures up to 60 and 108 times (mice and rabbits, respectively; FTC), 15 and 70 times (rats and rabbits, respectively; RPV) and equal to and 53 times (rats and rabbits, respectively; TAF) the exposure at the recommended daily dose of these components in ODEFSEY (see Data ) . Likewise, no adverse developmental effects were seen when FTC was administered to mice and RPV was administered to rats through lactation at exposures up to approximately 60 and 63 times, respectively, the exposure at the recommended daily dose of these components in ODEFSEY. No adverse effects were observed in the offspring when TDF was administered through lactation at tenofovir exposures of approximately 14 times the exposure at the recommended daily dosage of ODEFSEY. Data Human Data Prospective reports from the APR of overall major birth defects in pregnancies exposed to drug components of ODEFSEY are compared with a U.S. background major birth defect rate. Methodological limitations of the APR include the use of MACDP as the external comparator group. The MACDP population is not disease-specific, evaluates women and infants from a limited geographic area, and does not include outcomes for births that occurred at less than 20 weeks gestation. Emtricitabine (FTC): Based on prospective reports to the APR of over 5,400 exposures to FTC-containing regimens during pregnancy resulting in live births (including over 3,900 exposed in the first trimester and over 1,500 exposed in the second/third trimester), the prevalence of birth defects in live births was 2.6% (95% CI: 2.2% to 3.2%) and 2.7% (95% CI: 1.9% to 3.7%) following first and second/third trimester exposure, respectively, to FTC-containing regimens. Rilpivirine (RPV): RPV in combination with a background regimen was evaluated in a clinical trial of 19 HIV-1 infected pregnant subjects during the second and third trimesters and postpartum. Each of the subjects were on an RPV-based regimen at the time of enrollment. Twelve subjects completed the trial through the postpartum period (6–12 weeks after delivery) and pregnancy outcomes are missing for six subjects. The exposure (C 0h and AUC) of total RPV was approximately 30 to 40% lower during pregnancy compared with postpartum (6 to 12 weeks). The protein binding of RPV was similar (>99%) during second trimester, third trimester, and postpartum period [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ] . One subject discontinued the trial following fetal death at 25 weeks gestation due to suspected premature rupture of membranes. Among the 12 subjects who were virologically suppressed at baseline (less than 50 copies/mL), virologic response was preserved in 10 subjects (83.3%) through the third trimester visit and in 9 subjects (75%) through the 6–12 week postpartum visit. Virologic outcomes during the third trimester visit were missing for two subjects who were withdrawn (one subject was nonadherent to the study drug and one subject withdrew consent). Among the 10 infants with HIV test results available, born to 10 HIV-infected pregnant subjects, all had test results that were negative for HIV-1 at the time of delivery and up to 16 weeks postpartum. All 10 infants received antiretroviral prophylactic treatment with zidovudine. RPV was well tolerated during pregnancy and postpartum. There were no new safety findings compared with the known safety profile of RPV in HIV–1-infected adults. Based on prospective reports to the APR of over 750 exposures to RPV-containing regimens during pregnancy resulting in live births (including over 550 exposed in the first trimester and over 200 exposed in the second/third trimester), the prevalence of birth defects in live births was 1.4% (95% CI: 0.6% to 2.8%) and 1.5% (95% CI: 0.3% to 4.3%) following first and second/third trimester exposure, respectively, to RPV-containing regimens. Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF): Based on prospective reports to the APR of over 660 exposures to TAF-containing regimens during pregnancy resulting in live births (including over 520 exposed in the first trimester and over 130 exposed in the second/third trimester), the prevalence of birth defects in live births was 4.2% (95% CI: 2.6% to 6.3%) and 3.0% (95% CI: 0.8% to 7.5%) following first and second/third trimester exposure, respectively, to TAF-containing regimens. Animal Data Emtricitabine: FTC was administered orally to pregnant mice (250, 500, or 1000 mg/kg/day) and rabbits (100, 300, or 1000 mg/kg/day) through organogenesis (on gestation days 6 through 15, and 7 through 19, respectively). No significant toxicological effects were observed in embryo-fetal toxicity studies performed with FTC in mice at exposures (AUC) approximately 60 times higher and in rabbits at approximately 108 times higher than human exposures at the recommended daily dose. In a pre/postnatal development study with FTC, mice were administered doses up to 1000 mg/kg/day; no significant adverse effects directly related to drug were observed in the offspring exposed daily from before birth ( in utero ) through sexual maturity at daily exposures (AUC) of approximately 60-fold higher than human exposures at the recommended daily dose. Rilpivirine: RPV was administered orally to pregnant rats (40, 120, or 400 mg/kg/day) and rabbits (5, 10, or 20 mg/kg/day) through organogenesis (on gestation days 6 through 17, and 6 through 19, respectively). No significant toxicological effects were observed in embryo-fetal toxicity studies performed with RPV in rats and rabbits at exposures 15 (rats) and 70 (rabbits) times higher than the exposure in humans at the recommended dose of 25 mg once daily. In a pre/postnatal development study with RPV, where rats were administered up to 400 mg/kg/day through lactation, no significant adverse effects directly related to drug were noted in the offspring. Tenofovir Alafenamide: TAF was administered orally to pregnant rats (25, 100, or 250 mg/kg/day) and rabbits (10, 30, or 100 mg/kg/day) through organogenesis (on gestation days 6 through 17, and 7 through 20, respectively). No adverse embryo-fetal effects were observed in rats and rabbits at TAF exposures similar to (rats) and approximately 53 (rabbits) times higher than the exposure in humans at the recommended daily dose of ODEFSEY. TAF is rapidly converted to tenofovir; the observed tenofovir exposure in rats and rabbits were 59 (rats) and 93 (rabbits) times higher than human tenofovir exposures at the recommended daily doses. Since TAF is rapidly converted to tenofovir and a lower tenofovir exposure in rats and mice was observed after TAF administration compared to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF, another prodrug for tenofovir) administration, a pre/postnatal development study in rats was conducted only with TDF. Doses up to 600 mg/kg/day were administered through lactation, no adverse effects were observed in the offspring on gestation day 7 [and lactation day 20] at tenofovir exposures of approximately 14 [21] times higher than the exposures in humans at the recommended daily dose of ODEFSEY. 8.2 Lactation Risk Summary The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend that HIV-infected mothers not breastfeed their infants, to avoid risking postnatal transmission of HIV. Based on published data, emtricitabine has been shown to be present in human milk; it is unknown if rilpivirine (RPV) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) are present in human milk. RPV is present in rat milk and tenofovir has been shown to be present in the milk of lactating rats and rhesus monkeys after administration of TDF (see Data ). It is unknown if TAF is present in animal milk. It is not known if the components of ODEFSEY affect milk production or have effects on the breastfed infant. Because of the potential for (1) HIV transmission (in HIV-negative infants), (2) developing viral resistance (in HIV-positive infants), and (3) adverse reactions in a breastfed infant similar to those seen in adults, instruct mothers not to breastfeed if they are receiving ODEFSEY. Data Rilpivirine: In animals, no studies have been conducted to assess the excretion of RPV directly; however, RPV was measured in rat pups which were exposed through the milk of treated dams (dosed up to 400 mg/kg/day). Tenofovir Alafenamide: Studies in rats and monkeys have demonstrated that tenofovir is excreted in milk. Tenofovir was excreted into the milk of lactating rats following oral administration of TDF (up to 600 mg/kg/day) at up to approximately 24% of the median plasma concentration in the highest dosed animals at lactation day 11 . Tenofovir was excreted into the milk of lactating monkeys, following a single subcutaneous (30 mg/kg) dose of tenofovir, at concentrations up to approximately 4% of plasma concentration resulting in exposure (AUC) of approximately 20% of plasma exposure. 8.4 Pediatric Use The efficacy and safety of ODEFSEY as a complete regimen for the treatment of HIV-1 infection was established in pediatric patients 12 years of age and older with body weight greater than or equal to 35 kg [see Dosage and Administration (2.2) ]. Use of ODEFSEY in this age group is supported by adequate and well-controlled studies of RPV+FTC+TDF in adults with HIV-1 infection, adequate and well-controlled studies of FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI in adults with HIV-1 infection, and by the following pediatric studies [see Clinical Studies (14) ]: 48-week open-label trial of 36 antiretroviral treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected pediatric subjects 12 to less than 18 years old weighing at least 32 kg treated with 25 mg per day of RPV and other antiretrovirals. The safety and efficacy of RPV administered with other antiretrovirals were similar to that of antiretroviral treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected adults on this regimen [see Adverse Reactions (6.1) and Clinical Studies (14) ]. 24-week open-label trial of 23 antiretroviral treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected pediatric subjects 12 to less than 18 years old (weighing at least 35 kg) treated with FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI. The safety and efficacy of FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI were similar to that of antiretroviral treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected adults on this regimen [see Adverse Reactions (6.1) and Clinical Studies (14) ]. Because it is a fixed-dose combination tablet, the dose of ODEFSEY cannot be adjusted for patients of lower age and weight. The safety and efficacy of ODEFSEY have not been established in pediatric patients weighing less than 35 kg [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ] . 8.5 Geriatric Use In clinical trials, 80 of the 97 subjects enrolled aged 65 years and over received FTC+TAF with EVG+COBI. No differences in safety or efficacy have been observed between elderly subjects and those between 12 and less than 65 years of age. Clinical trials of RPV did not include sufficient numbers of subjects aged 65 years and over to determine whether they respond differently from younger subjects [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ]. 8.6 Renal Impairment No dosage adjustment of ODEFSEY is recommended in patients with estimated creatinine clearance greater than or equal to 30 mL per minute. ODEFSEY should be used with caution in adults patients with ESRD (estimated creatinine clearance below 15mL per minute) who are receiving chronic hemodialysis and increased monitoring is recommended for RPV-related adverse effects in patients with ESRD, as RPV concentrations may be increased due to alteration of drug absorption, distribution, and metabolism secondary to renal dysfunction. On days of hemodialysis, administer the daily dose of ODEFSEY after completion of hemodialysis treatment [see Dosage and Administration (2.4) and Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ] . ODEFSEY is not recommended in patients with severe renal impairment (estimated creatinine clearance of 15 to below 30 mL per minute), or in patients with ESRD who are not receiving chronic hemodialysis, as the safety of ODEFSEY has not been established in these populations [see Dosage and Administration (2.4) and Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ]. 8.7 Hepatic Impairment No dosage adjustment of ODEFSEY is recommended in patients with mild (Child-Pugh Class A) or moderate (Child-Pugh Class B) hepatic impairment. ODEFSEY has not been studied in patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class C) [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ] .

16 HOW SUPPLIED/STORAGE AND HANDLING ODEFSEY tablets are gray, capsule-shaped, and film coated with "GSI" debossed on one side and "255" on the other side. Each bottle contains 30 tablets (NDC 61958-2101-1), a silica gel desiccant, and a polyester coil, and is closed with a child-resistant closure. Store below 30°C (86°F). Keep container tightly closed. Dispense only in original container.

Store below 30°C (86°F). Keep container tightly closed. Dispense only in original container.

WARNING: POST TREATMENT ACUTE EXACERBATION OF HEPATITIS B Severe acute exacerbations of hepatitis B have been reported in patients who are coinfected with HIV-1 and HBV and have discontinued products containing emtricitabine (FTC) and/or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and may occur with discontinuation of ODEFSEY. Hepatic function should be monitored closely with both clinical and laboratory follow-up for at least several months in patients who are coinfected with HIV-1 and HBV and discontinue ODEFSEY. If appropriate, anti-hepatitis B therapy may be warranted [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) ] . WARNING: POST TREATMENT ACUTE EXACERBATION OF HEPATITIS B See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning. Severe acute exacerbations of hepatitis B have been reported in patients who are coinfected with HIV-1 and HBV and have discontinued products containing emtricitabine (FTC) and/or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and may occur with discontinuation of ODEFSEY. Hepatic function should be monitored closely in these patients. If appropriate, anti-hepatitis B therapy may be warranted. ( 5.1 )