This site is intended for healthcare professionals
Light microscopy of the internal lining of the urinary bladder; haematoxylin and eosin stain
Managing High-Risk NMIBC

Advances in diagnosis and management

Last updated:20th Feb 2025
Published:20th Jan 2025

Please answer this quick quiz before you read on. This helps us improve the educational design of our resources.

Take the quiz

Pathways to clear diagnosis

Risk stratification for NMIBC

Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a clinically heterogeneous disease that has a high recurrence rate. Patients with high-risk NMIBC have elevated disease progression rates and represent approximately 25% of NMIBC cases.1,2

Patients with high-grade T1 bladder cancer have a 42% rate of 5-year recurrence, and a 21% progression rate3

Risk stratification of patients with NMIBC is crucial to ensure they receive appropriate treatments and surveillance schedules. Patients with high-risk NMIBC require a more intensive management and follow-up plan compared with those with low or intermediate risk.3,4

Figure 1 shows the risk stratification criteria according to the European Association of Urology (EAU) and the American Urological Association (AUA) and Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO). The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines use the AUA/SUO criteria.5 Patients are stratified according to the number of tumors, tumor size, recurrence rate, tumor stage, presence of carcinoma in situ, and tumor grade, and are designated as low risk, intermediate risk, high risk, and very high risk.3

Risk stratification criteria for NMIBC according to EAU and AUA/SUO, detailing the parameters, such as tumor size, number, and grade, necessary for stratification. EAU guidelines also consider patient age as part of the risk stratification criteria.

Figure 1. Risk stratification of NMIBC according to EAU and AUA/SUO.4,6 BCG, Bacillus Calmette–Guérin; CIS, carcinoma in situ; G1/2/3, grade 1/2/3; HG, high grade; LG, low grade; LVI, lymphovascular invasion.

High recurrence and progression rates demonstrate the need to accurately diagnose NMIBC and manage high-risk disease effectively to prevent progression.

Clinical presentation and differential diagnosis of NMIBC

Bladder cancer can coexist with, and mimic the symptoms of, urinary tract infections (UTIs), with 39% of women with bladder cancer initially misdiagnosed with UTIs, causing delays in treatment initiation3,7

Most cases of bladder cancer are diagnosed because of painless gross or microscopic hematuria.3,6 Gross hematuria (as opposed to microscopic hematuria) is associated with high-grade cancer, as statistically supported by a 2023 cross-sectional retrospective study (N=515).8

Around 20% of patients with NMIBC may present with increased urinary urgency, frequency, and dysuria.8 These features are more frequently observed in patients with carcinoma in situ than with papillary Ta/T1 tumors.3,9

Assessment of suspected bladder cancer

The precise diagnostic pathway for patients with NMIBC varies and should be individualized based on the patient’s risk of progression, and is dependent on resource availability.5,10

The initial evaluation of patients with suspected bladder cancers includes:3,5

  • Focused patient history and physical examination
  • Imaging of the abdomen/pelvis
  • Cystoscopy
  • Urinary cytology and biomarkers
  • Histopathologic assessment

Of these, cystoscopy is still the universally recommended primary diagnostic tool and gold standard for the initial evaluation of patients with suspected bladder cancer.3

If a lesion is documented, transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) should be carried out to confirm the diagnosis (and as part of initial surgical treatment).5 Figure 2 shows the diagnostic pathway, with the diagnostic tools discussed in detail below.

The diagnostic pathway for adults with suspected bladder cancer. The precise diagnostic pathway for individual patients may vary, for example, imaging may be carried out during the initial evaluation or during the primary evaluation, and more than one TURBT may be necessary.

Figure 2. Diagnostic pathway for adults with suspected bladder cancer.3,5 CIS, carcinoma in situ; EUA, examination under anesthesia; MIBC, muscle-invasive bladder cancer; NCCN, National Comprehensive Cancer Network; NMIBC, non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer; TURBT, transurethral resection of bladder tumor.

Patient history and physical examination

EAU guidelines mandate a focused patient history and physical examination (although this will not reveal NMIBC).9 Considering 50% of bladder cancer cases are attributed to smoking, NCCN guidelines detail screening for smoking.5,11

Imaging of the abdomen/pelvis

According to the AUA/SUO guidelines, upper urinary tract imaging should be performed as part of the initial evaluation of patients with suspected bladder cancer, with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) recommended.6 This is echoed by the NCCN guidelines, and imaging is recommended in parallel with cystoscopy (or in parallel with TURBT if not done prior to TURBT).5

By contrast, EAU guidelines recommend ultrasound and/or CT intravenous urography (IVU) during the initial evaluation and a CT urography only after a high-risk bladder tumor has been detected.9 CT urography can detect papillary tumors in the urinary tract, with IVU as an alternative if CT is not available.9

Ultrasound may be performed as an adjunct to physical examination since it can visualize intraluminal masses in the bladder, renal masses, and hydronephrosis, but it cannot exclude all causes of hematuria.9

Cystoscopy

Cystoscopic examination and histologic evaluation of sampled tissue are necessary for the diagnosis of bladder cancer, with cystoscopy typically performed using white light (WL).9 All the most recent recommendations advise use of “enhanced cystoscopy,” namely photodynamic diagnosis (PDD; fluorescence cystoscopy or blue light cystoscopy) or narrow-band imaging (NBI), if the equipment is available.5,9,10

These new cystoscopic technologies have a demonstrably higher sensitivity than WL cystoscopy for detecting tumors, particularly high-risk tumors such as carcinoma in situ, but have lower specificity and cannot help to rule out prostatic involvement.3,12,13 PDD and NBI can be performed with flexible endoscopic equipment in the office.3,14

Urinary cytology and biomarkers

Urinary cytology can be performed as an adjunct to cystoscopy and has high sensitivity in detecting high-risk tumors, including carcinoma in situ.3,9 European guidelines advise analysis of voided urine (fresh urine or urine with adequate fixation), using the Paris System (2nd edition).9

Currently, EAU and AUA/SUO guidelines do not recommend any urinary biomarkers as part of routine clinical practice for diagnosis or follow-up.9,10 Other guidelines, such as the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), recommend a urinary biomarker test (such as UroVysion using fluorescence in situ hybridization [FISH], ImmunoCyt, or a nuclear matrix protein 22 [NMP22] test) for patients with suspected bladder cancer.15

Histopathologic assessment

Histopathology of the tissue obtained through cystoscopy-guided biopsies and TURBT is one of the most reliable tools for assessing the depth of tumor infiltration, and hence essential for risk stratification of NMIBC.3

Of note, there is significant variability among pathologists regarding the diagnosis of carcinoma in situ, and there is inter-observer variability in the classification of stage T1 versus Ta tumors and tumor grading using both the 1973 and 2022 World Health Organization (WHO) classification.9

European guidelines strongly recommend using the 2017 TNM system to classify the depth of tumor invasion, and weakly recommend the use of both the 1973 and 2004/2022 WHO grading classification systems (or a hybrid system).9

TURBT

TURBT has key diagnostic and treatment roles – the goal is to confirm the clinical diagnosis and remove all visible lesions.3 A successful TURBT will identify the factors required to assign disease risk and clinical stage.9 To ensure accurate staging, guidelines recommend a second TURBT for certain patients, including those with incompletely resected tumors, T1 tumors, or with high-grade NMIBC, and a repeat TURBT is recommended 2–6 weeks after the initial TURBT.5,9,10

To ensure correct pathological assessment following TURBT, resected and analyzed tissue must be of high quality.9 EAU guidelines uniquely recommend use of a ‘TURBT checklist’ to support high-quality biopsy sample collection, shown in Figure 3.9

The TURBT checklist is recommended by EAU guidelines to ensure an accurate NMIBC diagnosis and details the necessary operating room equipment, irrigation fluid, and disease characteristics to consider prior to commencing the procedure. The checklist also compares the factors to consider for cystoscopy vs TURBT.

Figure 3. The TURBT checklist is recommended by EAU guidelines to obtain all relevant information for an accurate NMIBC diagnosis.9 CIS, carcinoma in situ; NBI, narrow-band imaging; NMIBC, non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer; PDD, photodynamic diagnosis; TURBT, transurethral resection of bladder tumor.

Next section

References

  1. Bedke, 2023. Optimizing outcomes for high-risk, non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: The evolving role of PD-(L)1 inhibition. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.10.004
  2. Grabe-Heyne, 2023. Intermediate and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: An overview of epidemiology, burden, and unmet needs. https://www.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1170124
  3. Lopez-Beltran, 2024. Advances in diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer. https://www.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-076743
  4. Sylvester, 2021. European Association of Urology (EAU) prognostic factor risk groups for non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) incorporating the WHO 2004/2016 and WHO 1973 classification systems for grade: An update from the EAU NMIBC Guidelines Panel. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.12.033
  5. NCCN, 2024. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Bladder cancer. Version 6.2024. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/bladder.pdf
  6. Chang, 2016. Diagnosis and treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: AUA/SUO guideline. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.06.049
  7. More than half of people with bladder cancer are misdiagnosed with another disease, 2023. https://worldbladdercancer.org/news_events/press-release-more-than-half-of-people-with-bladder-cancer-are-misdiagnosed-with-another-disease/
  8. Jakus, 2023. The impact of the initial clinical presentation of bladder cancer on histopathological and morphological tumor characteristics. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134259
  9. Gontero, 2024. European Association of Urology guidelines on mon-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (TaT1 and carcinoma in situ)—A summary of the 2024 guidelines update. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2024.07.027
  10. Holzbeierlein, 2024. Diagnosis and treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: AUA/SUO guideline: 2024 amendment. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000003846
  11. Jubber, 2023. Epidemiology of bladder cancer in 2023: A systematic review of risk factors. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2023.03.029
  12. Mowatt, 2011. Photodynamic diagnosis of bladder cancer compared with white light cystoscopy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. https://www.doi.org/10.1017/s0266462310001364
  13. Russo, 2021. Performance of narrow-band imaging (NBI) and photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) fluorescence imaging compared to white light cystoscopy (WLC) in detecting non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review and lesion-level diagnostic meta-analysis. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13174378
  14. Wojcik, 2022. The Paris System for reporting urinary cytology. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88686-8
  15. NICE, 2015. Bladder cancer: Diagnosis and management (NG2). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng2 
Welcome: