Darzalex (daratumumab-SC) based quadruplet regimen is approved by the European Commission for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are transplant-eligible
Janssen-Cilag International NV, a Johnson & Johnson company, announced that the European Commission (EC) approved the indication extension for Darzalex (daratumumab) subcutaneous (SC) formulation in combination with bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (daratumumab-VRd) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are eligible for an autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT).
Patients will have the opportunity to receive this daratumumab SC-based quadruplet therapy at initial diagnosis, providing them with a new treatment shown to significantly improve outcomes.
This approval is supported by data from the Phase III PERSEUS study, which evaluated daratumumab SC-based quadruplet regimen for induction and consolidation therapy, followed by daratumumab SC and lenalidomide (D-R) maintenance therapy, compared to bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd) during induction and consolidation, followed by lenalidomide (R) maintenance in 709 patients with NDMM eligible for ASCT.
“Multiple myeloma is a complex and highly varied disease, which reinforces the need for continuous innovation in first-line treatment strategies to deepen responses, reduce relapse and ultimately improve long-term outcomes,” said Dr. Paula Rodriguez-Otero, Department of Hematology, Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.* “The EC approval of this daratumumab SC-based quadruplet regimen offers a practice-changing new option, that has shown the potential to significantly improve progression-free survival, complete response rates, and MRD-negativity status compared to the current standard of care.”
Findings from the PERSEUS study, after a median follow-up of 47.5 months, demonstrated a significant improvement in the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS), with the daratumumab-VRd regimen reducing the risk of disease progression or death by 58 percent compared to VRd (hazard ratio [HR], 0.42; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], 0.30-0.59; p<0.0001).1 Treatment with daratumumab-VRd resulted in deeper responses compared to VRd with overall minimal residual disease (MRD)-negativity rate assessed at 10-5 of 75.2 percent vs. 47.5 percent (p<0.001), complete response or better of 87.9 percent vs 70.1 percent (p<0.001) and importantly, sustained MRD negativity for ≥12 months of 64.8 percent vs 29.7 percent, respectively.
Title