Phase II Trial for Prostate Cancer Patients Terminated

This decision, mutually agreed upon by both senior management and the board of directors, was based on a protocol-specified interim review of the safety, PK and efficacy data, which showed a much higher rate of PSA90 response in patients treated with enzalutamide monotherapy (which is standard of care for this patient population) than were expected based upon historical data. In addition, there was no clear efficacy benefit seen with the combination of masofaniten plus enzalutamide compared to enzalutamide single agent. A futility analysis determined a low likelihood of meeting the prespecified primary endpoint of the study. The combination of masofaniten plus enzalutamide was well-tolerated with no new safety signals and a safety profile similar to that seen in Phase 1 studies.

"Providing a meaningful clinical benefit to patients in our clinical trials, along with a robust safety profile, is of utmost importance to us at ESSA," said David Parkinson, MD, President and CEO. "We designed this randomized study to rigorously evaluate the clinical benefit of adding masofaniten to enzalutamide. We made the difficult decision to terminate this Phase 2 study following the interim analysis because we concluded that the emerging efficacy profile of masofaniten combined with enzalutamide would not likely meet the primary endpoint of the study, nor our internal requirements for a prostate cancer therapy candidate. We would like to thank our partners, investigators, employees, and most importantly, the patients and their families involved in our clinical trials."